The correct answer is C) intermediate scrutiny test.
A law that placed restrictions on courses girls could take in high school would be evaluated by the courts using the intermediate scrutiny test.
We are talking about the kind of test the Court uses to determine the constitutionality of a statute. When the members of the Court need to make a decision, this test is a tool they have to help them decide if a statute passed by the federal government or a state affects in a negative way some protected classes such as the case of the courses girls could take in high school.
A tyrant would want to convince the people not to insist on democracy. He could use arguments such as:
Democracy will make the country weak and vulnerable to outside attacks
Democracy will not be an efficient form of government because people would argue too much
His rule is better because it provides stability
Cohort differences can be described as the major explanation offered to account for the differences in the pattern of iq stability or decline over adulthood shown in cross-sectional versus longitudinal studies.
<h3>What is meant by cohort difference?</h3>
Cohort is the term that tells us of the people that are around or about the same age.
This is used to refer to the way that the people of different ages react or do things at a particular point in time.
Read more on cohort differences here:
brainly.com/question/14368283
#SPJ11
D,working backwards cause u work faster backwards
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is C. Hope i wasn't to late.
