F(2) = 20(1.25)^x
f(2) = 20(1.25)^2 - plug in 2 to x
f(2) = 20(1.5625) - calculate 1.25^2
f(2) = 31.25 - simplify
Answer:
889674568890
Step-by-step explanation:
I used a calculator :)
Answer:
Given sequence is not a geometric progression and there will be no common ration for this sequence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Need to determine common ration for the following geometric sequence
32, 8, 2, 12, ...
In given geometric sequence
a1 = 32, a2=8, a3=2, a4=12 ……….
Common ratio = 
Since 
so we can say that given sequence is not a geometric progression and there will no no common ration for this sequence.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
pop 1 n₁ = 260, p₁ = 58% = 0.58
pop 2 n₂ = 260, p₂ = 8% = 0.08
Null hypothesis: p₁ ≤ p₂
Alternative hypothesis: p₁ > p₂
The test statistic : p₁-p₂ / √{p-sample (1 - p-sample) (1/n₁ + 1/n₂)}
where p-sample is sample proportion = p₁n₁ +p₂n₂ / n₁+n₂
Thus, p-sample = 0.58x260 +0.08x260 / 260+260 =150.8+20.8 / 520 = 171.6 / 520 = 0.33.
Thus, the test statistic is (0.58 - 0.08) / √[0.33 (1-0.33) (0.0038+0.0038)
= 0.5 / √[0.33(0.67) (0.0076)
= 0.5 / √0.00168036
= 0.5 / 0.04099
= 12.20
P = P(Z>12.20) = 1-P(Z≤12.20) at a significance level of 0.1= the p-value is less than the hypothesized thus, we have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and concluding that vinyl gloves have a greater virus leak than latex gloves.
The answer is false due to the object is changes shape not size
