The question above wants to assess your ability to interpret a text and argue over that interpretation. For that reason, I can't write this script for you, but I'll show you how you can write it.
First, you need to understand what Dee and Magie represent in the story and what qualities they both have that make them apt to inherit the quilts. You can search for articles that analyze the two characters and give you greater insight into the two girls.
Based on that, you can write your argument as follows:
- Introduce who you deem worthy of receiving the quilts.
- Show what these quilts represent.
- Show the reasons why you considered this girl deserving of the quilts.
- Show why the other girl is not worthy of receiving the quilts.
Importantly, Dee is a woman who became involved in black activism, defending the exposure and pride of African ancestry. However, this placement is seen as something aesthetic for Dee's family. Her mother doesn't believe that Dee is actually representing black people, as black people are resilient people who take care of their families and face challenges with courage rather than ornaments like Maggie.
More information:
brainly.com/question/15186187?referrer=searchResults
1. African Americans faced discrimination.
2. Encouraged a revolutionary style of art.
3. Creating an identity for African Americans
4. It provided African Americans an opportunity to create a new identity by using art to express their feelings and experiences.
5. (Paragraph 6)
Explanation:
khaye w7ehd8hdbdudbheijeveisjve
Answer:
The basis of this argument is that verbs are conjugated only in the present and past tense. If we want to refer to the future, we have to use the auxiliary verb will, or the be going to phrase followed by the verb in present or past, or the present tense. Since in English, there is no change in the conjugation of the verbs for the future, some linguistics claim that there are two tenses (past and present) while others claim that there are three because we form the future tense with the addition of the auxiliary or use present simple or continuous.
Explanation:
Linguistics such as Quicker Al claims that there are two tenses, present, and past since they are expressed by inflections in their verbs, while future does not have inflections. There is no future tense, but there is future time. Time is related to our perception of reality, making the future subjective. On the other side, tense expresses when an action happens, taking into account the moment that the person is speaking. Linguistics such as Hatav or Klein claims three tenses' existence, past, present, and future. They state that we can refer to the future with the addition of the auxiliary verb will, or the phrase be going to, or the use of present simple, or continuous even though there is no specific inflection in the verb, as it happens in other languages like Portuguese or Spanish. They identify the future with the definition of tense.
Bob: So, what did you call me up here for?
Jen: I wanted to talk to you about the Jefferson's. I just wanted to let you know that they have been through a lot over the past few days. So, if you could just give them time and let them ease up a bit, then that would be great.
Make sense? Also, hope I helped! I apologize if the answer is wrong.
