1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GaryK [48]
3 years ago
5

A person buys X in one market and combines it with Y purchased in another market. The combination of X and Y gives Z, which the

person sells in a third market for a higher price than the sum of the prices of X and Y. Which theory of profit is most consistent with this example
Business
1 answer:
Sindrei [870]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

arbitration

Explanation:

Arbitration occurs when the price of a security or a commodity varies significantly between different markets. For example, I purchase gold in the United Kingdom at a lower price than in the United States, and I bring it to the United States and make a profit. Arbitration opportunities result from market inefficiencies and a lack of a single price.

You might be interested in
Imagine an economy of 10 individuals. their annual incomes are reported below. approximately what percentage of this economy's i
nlexa [21]

Answer:

Approximately 18.64% of this economy's income is held by the poorest 40% of the population.

Explanation:

In an economy of 10 individuals, the poorest 40% of the population means the poorest 4 individuals.

from the table, the poorest 4 individuals are:

Anna, Walter, Bob and Steve.

total income of the poorest 4 individuals = $100 + $200 + $300 + $500

= $1,100

total income of all the individuals in the population = $1000 + $300 + $800 + $700 + $200 + $600 + $500 + $100 + $800 + $900

= $5,900

The percentage of the economy's income held by the poorest 40% is given by:

= [(total income of the poorest 4 individuals)/(total income of all the individuals in the population)]*100

= [($1,100)/$5900]*100

= 18.64%

Therefore, Approximately 18.64% of this economy's income is held by the poorest 40% of the population.

8 0
3 years ago
When Apple releases a new iPhone model, customers often line up for hours just to be one of the first to own the phone, since th
Kamila [148]
I don't know this for a fact, but I believe that Apple could not be where it is financially without a big fat shot of skimming pricing in this situation.

Shear the sheep !
Fleece the goats !
Take no prisoners !
Don't look back !
They asked for it !
Whatever the traffic will bear !
3 0
3 years ago
In the course of creating an effective business message, excellent business thinkers are most likely to
Irina18 [472]

Answer:

a) make well-reasoned conclusions and solutions ; & b) begin jotting down a rough draft right away to capture their ideas.

Explanation:

Effective Business message should be - complete, clear, concise, concrete, correct, courteous, coherent.

Rough draft is good for brainstorming & initial preliminary creation stage of business message. After having a bunch of ideas : its important to well arrange them in a coherent, clear way & giving complete, concise structure. This implies better understanding of conclusions, solutions.

4 0
3 years ago
Sweden has real GDP per capita of $50,000, while Chile has real GDP per capita of $25,000. If real GDP per capita in Sweden grow
Katyanochek1 [597]

Answer:

option (B) 35 years

Explanation:

Given:

Real per capita GDP of Sweden = $50,000

Real per capita GDP of Chile = $25,000

Growth rate of Sweden = 2%

Growth rate of Chile = 4%

As per the Rule of 70, the economy's GDP doubles in \frac{\textup{70}}{\textup{Growth rate}}

Therefore,

The GDP of Sweden will double in = \frac{\textup{70}}{\textup{2}} = 35 years

and,

Chile will double in \frac{\textup{70}}{\textup{4}} = 17.5 years

Therefore,

in 35 years the GDP of Sweden will be $100,000

and,

In 35 years the GDP of Chile will also be ($50,000 in 17.5 years and $100,000 in next 17.5 years) = $100,000

Therefore,

The real GDP per capita in the two nations to converge in 35 years

Hence,

The correct answer is option (B) 35 years

8 0
3 years ago
If investment funds are limited, the net present value of one project should not be compared directly to the net present value o
Kryger [21]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Net present value is the present value of after-tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.

If projects been examined have different initial investments, it doesn't affect comparison between the projects.

Only projects with positive NPV should be chosen and if both projects have a positive NPV, the project with the higher NPV should be chosen

It is only when they have different life spans that comparison might be affected.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • An institutional broker wants to review their book of customers to see which are most active. Given a list of trades by customer
    9·1 answer
  • Beacon Corporation issued a 4 percent stock dividend on 30,500 shares of its $7 par common stock. At the time of the dividend, t
    14·2 answers
  • What is behavioral finance? What does behavioral finance have to do with personal and family finance?
    6·2 answers
  • The boy scouts, the veterans of foreign wars, most civic organizations, and many groups that people join because of mutual inter
    14·1 answer
  • Suppose your total taxable income this year is $75,000. You are taxed at a rate of 10% on the first $25,000, 20% on the next $25
    13·1 answer
  • Gdp may be found by _________________. (lo2, 3)
    7·1 answer
  • What is an example of a<br> government limit on the use of business<br> property?
    12·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST !!!! NEED ASAP
    14·2 answers
  • Ralph is leasing a $32,000 car for 36 months. The terms of his lease include an 8. 5% interest rate (money factor of 0. 00354) a
    12·1 answer
  • goal of a strategic position is to create the largest gap possible between the ________ that a firm creates through its offering
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!