1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kobotan [32]
3 years ago
12

F(x) = x^2. what us g(x)?​

Mathematics
1 answer:
Likurg_2 [28]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Ues

Step-by-step explanation:

Ues papa math or demos and that should help

You might be interested in
In a race in which twelve automobiles are entered and there are no​ ties, in how many ways can the first three finishers come​ i
k0ka [10]
That is 3 slots
12 in 1st slot
11 in 2nd
10 in 3rd

so that is 12*11*10 or 1320 ways
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A. Left skewed<br> b. Right skewed<br> C. Symmetric<br> d. Symmetric with<br> outliers
mote1985 [20]

Answer:

1. a: left skewed

2. c: symmetric

6 0
3 years ago
He figure is rotated counterclockwise. Which rotation could have taken place?
ruslelena [56]

Answer:

a 90° rotation

I'm not sure about answer...

7 0
3 years ago
$0.25 per minute for the first 400 minutes. Write the function that models
Ratling [72]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A right triangle has legs measuring 4.5 meters and 1.5 meters. The lenghts of the legs of a second triangle are proportional to
Eduardwww [97]
We know that
in the first triangle
the ratio of the legs are
4.5/1.5-----> 3

then
case <span>A) 6 m and 2 m ------> ratio=6/3----> 3
so
</span><span>the legs of a second triangle are proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle

</span>case B) 8 m and 5 m ------> ratio=8/5---->1.6
so
the legs of a second triangle are not proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle

case C) 7 m and 3.5 mm ------> ratio=7/3.5---->2
so
the legs of a second triangle are not proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle


case D) 10 m and 2.5 m ------> ratio=10/2.5---->4
so
the legs of a second triangle are not proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle

case E) 11.25 m and 3.75 m ------> ratio=11.25/3.75---->3
so
the legs of a second triangle are  proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle

the answer is
A) 6 m and 2 m
E) 11.25 m and 3.75 m




4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. How are systems of equations used in the real world?<br> Help me plzzzz
    6·1 answer
  • Write a sequence that has four geometric means between 31 and –23,540,625.
    11·2 answers
  • an insurance company crashed 4 cars at 5 mph the cost for each 4 crashes was $417, $454, $415, $232. compute the range, sample v
    12·2 answers
  • there are seventeen students in a class. twice a year each student gets a new box of crayons. boxes of crayons are package in gr
    15·2 answers
  • Help pls! id appreciate it, trying to get these done tonight
    11·2 answers
  • A few years​ ago, a total of 26812681 thousand people lived in the metropolitan areas of Las​ Vegas, Nevada, and​ Sacramento, Ca
    14·1 answer
  • Brenna saved 36% on a $15 pair of sunglasses. Choose the correct expression to find 36% of $15.
    15·2 answers
  • Find the slope of the line represented by the data below
    10·1 answer
  • What is the measure of minor arc eg ? 17° 75° 149° 211°
    12·2 answers
  • The function g(x) = x is transformed to obtain function h:
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!