Answer:
B. It will not be enforced due to the statute of frauds.
Explanation:
Jim and Sue ''orally agreed to how the marital assets would be split if they divorced'', but however did not sign any agreement that makes the contract valid. Thus, the contract will not be enforced due to the statute of frauds. A statute of frauds, simply means a contract without sufficient written evidence agreed and signed by parties to the contract.
<h2>Joshua would lose and Sue would benefit from unanticipated inflation.</h2>
Explanation:
- Both Joshua and Sue are associated with fixed pension and fixed interest respectively.
- Now the value of money goes down due to inflation
- So to live as usual, Joshua need to spend some extra money. But considering the fixed income, it's a lose to Joshua
- Whereas Sue is associated with fixed interest of mortgage. She is benefited because, though the inflation has changed the value of all other products, but the fixed interest rate does not change.
- "Fixed-rate mortgage holders are inflation winners", says "Thoma, professor of economics at the University of Oregon"
Personally in primary school there were a lot of people who chose not to conform but the one i remember most is this girl in my class who just didn't listen. I think personally she was trying to make a statement about she was and so she decided not to conform.
Univision's market appeal is most specifically aimed toward the HISPANIC market.
Hispanic or Latino according to the U.S. Census Bureau is an individual who is of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or any Spanish origin or culture".