1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fiasKO [112]
3 years ago
6

A reflection on the key values of the social work profession

Law
1 answer:
frozen [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

service, social justice, dignity and worth of the person, importance of human relationships, integrity, and competence.

Explanation:

tama po to..

You might be interested in
What did Dr. Umberger do to prove Dr. Coppolino’s guilt?
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Answer:

Murderer

Characteristics: Poisoner - Parricide

Number of victims: 1 +

Date of murder: August 28, 1965

Date of birth: 1933

Victim profile: His wife, Dr. Carmela Musetto, 32

Method of murder: Poisoning (anaesthetic succinylcholine chloride)

Location: New Jersey/Florida, USA

Status: Sentenced to life in prison on April 28, 1967. Paroled in 1979

 

Motive: So that he could marry his lover.

Crime: Coppolino was charged with killing his wife, Carmela at their home on Florida's Gulf of Mexico coast. He was also tried for murdering Colonel William E. Farber, the husband of his ex-lover Marjorie. However, he was acquitted from this offence.

Method: Coppolino gave Carmela an overdose in the form of an injection of the anaesthetic succinylcholine chloride.

Sentence: Coppolino was charged with second degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He served 12 years, before being let out for good behaviour.

Interesting facts: An overdose of succinylcholine chloride is difficult to detect in the body, as succinic acid and choline are found naturally in the body. To be able to prove this was the cause of Carmela's death, toxicologst Dr Joseph Umberger had to devise a test, which in June 1966 he succeeded in doing.

Coppolino was an experienced anaesthetist, who had had to give up work at an early age due to ill health. So he had the knowledge and the means to kill Carmela in this way.

It was claimed that Coppolino had also killed Farber in the same way. When he was exhumed, it was discovered that his cricoid cartilage was fractured, which suggested that he had been strangled. In court it was claimed that this damage could have occurred during exhumation, and that he had sufficient arteriosclerosis to have died of a heart attack, as was originally supposed.

3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP
Marta_Voda [28]

Answer:

yessssssssssssss

Explanation: they go out there way becous they have to put us in more dept and many more

5 0
3 years ago
Read this passage from the Bill of Rights:
Digiron [165]

Answer:

Mark me as brainlist

Explanation:

The original Constitution of 1788 contained very few specific restrictions on the ways in which the power of the national government could be exercised against the people. It guaranteed the right to trial by jury in criminal (but not civil) cases, placed limits on prosecutions and punishments for treason, forbade bills of attainder (laws aimed at particular persons) and ex post facto laws (laws that punished conduct that was legal when it happened), limited any restrictions on habeas corpus to certain designated emergencies, and prohibited the granting of titles of nobility. But the Constitution that emerged from the 1787 Constitutional Convention contained nothing like a comprehensive bill of rights. Most state constitutions of the time had bills of rights, and many citizens—and members of the Constitutional Convention—expected the new national constitution to have one as well. Nonetheless, the state delegations at the Constitutional Convention voted 10-0 against including a bill of rights in the Constitution.

3 0
3 years ago
A right is unenumerated if it is
Assoli18 [71]
Assumed to be a fundamental right
5 0
3 years ago
During the miranda warning a policeman informs the suspect that if they cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to them
Scilla [17]

Answer:

Due process

Explanation:


Everyone has a right to an attorney, rich or poor.
There must be fair treatment in the system so no matter who you are or what you've done, you will be appointed an attorney because the law states you have a right to one.

Due process; fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially as a citizen's entitlement.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • When you park on a hill, think abou
    7·1 answer
  • The attorneys and legal staff hired for larger businessess is referred to as a(N)
    12·1 answer
  • A child’s adoptive parents go to court to finalize the child’s adoption. This court would most likely be a court with which juri
    5·2 answers
  • No bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed. True or False
    10·1 answer
  • Write a short note on election symbols
    10·1 answer
  • The step in the legislative process that most likely ensures that a bill will be debated in the house of representatives is when
    15·1 answer
  • What is a similarity between the majority leader and the minority leader of the House of Representatives?
    8·1 answer
  • If you are being passed, you must _________ until the pass is complete.
    9·2 answers
  • Where do you live? <br><br><br>ANS: TELL LATER! <br><br> No​
    8·1 answer
  • 3. How can you use this document to argue for or against the jury system?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!