Well that would be the moss in the pond
Option 1 is the correct answer
Ragweed antigens bind ragweed and then bind mast cells which release histamine
<span>Allergies develop because of a Th2 response against the allergen. </span>
<span> For a start, when you have a question that needs answering in science, you formulate a null hypothesis. That is a negative statement which you then set out to prove or disprove. This is just a convention. So if your initial question is for example, "Does sugar dissolve in water?"
Your null hypothesis will be "Sugar does not dissolve in water."
You then set up your experiment and get some data.
Now if your data doesn't support your null hypothesis then you reject it and make the statement ,"Sugar does dissolve in water." As you can see from this simple example, a non-result is still a result so the idea of formulating new tests as mentioned by another answerer isn't necessary and in some ways is the incorrect thing to do. In science, hypotheses are often not supported by data and i would argue that this is the case a lot of the time. A non-result is still a result and you will have plenty to write about whichever way it goes. </span>
Eukaryotic cells have the ability to absorb other cells by phagocytosis.
<span>Characterized by the presence of the nucleus, formed by a rope DNA (the free ends) surrounded by two layers reticulum (nuclear envelope). Eukaryotic DNA forms a complex with a large number of proteins</span>
