Answer:
Just put the greatest number first and then the second greatest etc
Answer:
27/100
Explanation:
If she rolled the die 100 times and landed on 6 27 times then the theoretical probability of rolling a 6 would be 27/100
Hope this helps!
9514 1404 393
Answer:
17
Step-by-step explanation:
The two base angles are congruent, so we have ...
x +17 = 4x -34
51 = 3x . . . . . . . add 34-x
17 = x . . . . . . . . .divide by 3
Answer:
Option C
Step-by-step explanation:
n = 81
s2 = 625
H0: σ2 = 500
Ha: σ2 ≠ 500
Test Statistics X^2 = (n-1)s^2/ σ2 = (81-1)*625/500
X^2 = 100
P value = 0.0646 for degree of freedom = 81-1 = 80
And X^2 = 100
At 95% confidence interval
Alpha = 0.05 , p value = 0.0646
p < alpha, we will reject the null hypothesis
At 95% confidence, the null hypothesis
Answer:
1. 13 or -13
2. -5 < y < -3
3. 6 or -6
4. 1/8 or -1/8
Step-by-step explanation:
Clear the absolute-value bars by splitting the equation into its two cases, one for the Positive case and the other for the Negative case.
The Absolute Value term is |x|
For the Negative case we'll use -(x)
For the Positive case we'll use (x)
Step 3 :
Solve the Negative Case
-(x) = 13
Multiply
-x = 13
Multiply both sides by (-1)
x = -13
Which is the solution for the Negative Case
Step 4 :
Solve the Positive Case
(x) = 13
Which is the solution for the Positive Case
Step 5 :
Wrap up the solution
x=-13
x=13
But for the case of question (2) its a different pattern..
Since this is a "less than" absolute-value inequality, my first step is to clear the absolute value according to the "less than" pattern. Then I'll solve the linear inequality.
| y + 4 | < 1
–1 < y + 4 < 1
This is the pattern for "less than". Continuing, I'll subtract 3 from all three "sides" of the inequality:
–1 – 4 < y + 4 - 4 < 1 – 4
–5 < y < -3

The solution to the original absolute-value inequality, | y + 4 | < 1 , is the interval:
