Ask question

Ask question

All categories

nataly862011 [7]

2 years ago

5

The scale on a model of a frog is 2 cm = 25 mm. Find the actual length

1 answer:

otez555 [7]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

137.5

Step-by-step explanation:

2=25

4=50

6=75

8=100

10=125

11=125+12.5 = 137.5

You might be interested in

A car is traveling at a rate of 81 kilometers per hour. What is the car's rate in kilometers per minute? How many kilometers wil

shusha [124]

Only doing thos for the getting to knothinf

8 0

3 years ago

when a stone falls freely, the time taken to hit the ground varies as the square root of the distance fallen. If it takes four s

Eva8 [605]

Answer:

The stone would take approximately 10.107 seconds to fall 500 meters.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the statement of the problem, the following relationship of direct proportionality is built:

$t \propto y^{1/2}$

$t = k\cdot t^{1/2}$

Where:

$t$ - Time spent by the stone, measured in seconds.

$y$ - Height change experimented by the stone, measured in meters.

$k$ - Proportionality constant, measured in $\frac{s}{m^{1/2}}$ .

First, the proportionality constant is determined by clearing the respective variable and replacing all known variables:

$k = \frac{t}{y^{1/2}}$

If $t = 4\,s$ and $y=78.4\,m$ , then:

$k = \frac{4\,s}{(78.4\,m)^{1/2}}$

$k \approx 0.452\,\frac{s}{m^{1/2}}$

Then, the expression is $t = 0.452\cdot y^{1/2}$ . Finally, if $y = 500\,m$ , then the time is:

$t = 0.452\cdot (500\,m)^{1/2}$

$t \approx 10.107\,s$

The stone would take approximately 10.107 seconds to fall 500 meters.

4 0

3 years ago

Talib is trying to find the inverse of the function to the right. His work appears beneath it. Is his work correct? Explain your

Rasek [7]

To find the inverse of a function, we make the independent variable the subject of the formula.

Thus, the inverse of the given function is evaluated as follows.
$f(x)=-8x+4 \\ y=-8x+4 \\ -8x=y-4 \\ x= \frac{y-4}{-8} \\ f^{-1}(x)=\frac{x-4}{-8}$

From the work show, it can be seen that Talib's work is correct.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

(Anderson, 1.14) Assume that P(A) = 0.4 and P(B) = 0.7. Making no further assumptions on A and B, show that P(A ∩ B) satisfies 0

Goshia [24]

Answer with Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that

P(A)=0.4 and P(B)=0.7

We know that

$P(A)+P(B)+P(A\cap B)=P(A\cup B)$

We know that

Maximum value of $P(A\cup B)$ =1 and minimum value of $P(A\cup B)$ =0

$0\leq P(A\cup B )\leq 1$

$0\leq P(A)+P(B)-P(A\cap B)\leq 1$

$0\leq 0.4+0.7-P(A\cap B)\leq 1$

$0\leq 1.1-P(A\cap B)\leq 1$

$0\leq 1.1-P(A\cap B)$

$P(A\cap B)\leq 1.1$

It is not possible that $P(A\cap B)$ is equal to 1.1

$1.1-P(A\cap B)\leq 1$

$-P(A\cap B)\leq 1-1.1=-0.1$

Multiply by (-1) on both sides

$P(A\cap B)\geq 0.1$

Again, $P(A\cup B)\geq P(B)$

$0.4+0.7-P(A\cap B)\geq 0.7$

$1.1-P(A\cap B)\geq 0.7$

$-P(A\cap B)\geq -1.1+0.7=-0.4$

Multiply by (-1) on both sides

$P(A\cap B)\leq 0.4$

Hence, $0.1\leq P(A\cap B)\leq 0.4$

3 0

3 years ago

HELP<br> Please<br> Please<br> im failing

Reptile [31]

Answer:

6.9

7.-5

8.-10

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago