Answer: RISK PREVENTION AND HAZARD PREVENTION.
Explanation: Risk Prevention refers to all techniques, methods, management practices that helps to stop an anticipated adverse event or outcome.
Hazard prevention includes all techniques, methods, best practices employed in the minimisation or elimination of safety and health risks.
Hurricane Katrina was a Category 5 hurricane that made landfall on Florida and Louisiana in August 2005. Before this hurricane, Preventive measures was already put in place in anticipation of the catastrophe. This was done to minimize loss of lives and properties.
It is known as hunter x hunter
<span>d.ethos; appeals to ethics, logos; appeals to logic, pathos; appeals to emotions
The key thing here is understanding the 6 different words here. They are:
ethos, logos, pathos, emotion, logic, ethics.
You may notice that the 1st 3 words kinda look familiar, but not quite. The reason is that those words are greek and the last 3 words evolved from them. Let's look closer.
ethos looks like it's related to ethics. And that is correct.
logos looks like it's related to logic and that is also correct.
pathos is the root for words such as pathetic, pitiful, etc. Words that evoke an emotional response.
Now with the above in mind, let's look at the options and pick the right one.
a.ethos; appeals to emotion
logos; appeals to logic
pathos; appeals to ethics
* Bad choice. Ethos applies to ethics, not emotion, and visa versa.
b.ethos; appeals to logic
logos; appeals to ethics
pathos; appeals to emotions
* Bad choice. Ethos applies to ethics, not logic.
c.ethos; appeals to pathos
logos; appeals to ethics
pathos; appeals to emotions
* Bad choice. This one is a bit of a mix and match. And having two greek words for the 1st choice? Can it be any more obviously wrong?
d.ethos; appeals to ethics
logos; appeals to logic
pathos; appeals to emotions
* Correct. All of the options match.</span>
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
