Answer:
This is an example of causal reasoning.
Explanation:
It is an example of causal reasoning because the statement is relating two facts as if one would be the cause of the other. In this case, being bald is the cause, and the effect is a heart attack. The flaw in this reasoning is that there is not enough evidence to prove that baldness can increase the risk of heart attacks. That is something that science has to investigate to check that this statement is not a fallacy of false cause.
<u>Q</u><u>U</u><u>E</u><u>S</u><u>T</u><u>I</u><u>O</u><u>N</u><u> </u><u>:</u>
- what does pneumonoultramicros--copicsilicovolcanoconiosis refer to?
<u>A</u><u>N</u><u>S</u><u>W</u><u>E</u><u>R</u><u> </u><u>:</u>
- lung disease caused by the inhalation of very fine silicate or quartz dust, causing inflammation in the lungs.
HOPE IT HELPS YOU
There are no choices. Sorry, couldn't help but there are no resources to help.
