1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pie
3 years ago
11

Select the correct answer.

History
2 answers:
DiKsa [7]3 years ago
4 0
The stamp act of 1765
Ivenika [448]3 years ago
3 0

The Stamp Act of 1765.

The stamp act was an insanely high tax placed on the American colonists by the British empire, and Americans had absolutely no say in it.

You might be interested in
What was the Balfour declaration and why was it significant?
nalin [4]
Did it come with answers
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do modern Native Americans exercise sovereignty?
poizon [28]

Answer:

The answer is A.They run tribal governments.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What created the Roosevelt Recession in 1937?
harina [27]
Keynesian economists stated that the recession of 1937 was a result of a premature effort to curb government spending and balance the budget. Roosevelt had been cautious not to run large deficits
3 0
3 years ago
Matthew learned how to break dance when he was just seven years old. His older brother taught him the new dance trend when he an
vitfil [10]
THE RIGT ANSWER IS C
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The New Deal ended in 1938 partly because
    9·2 answers
  • Based on the excerpt what does paine argue about the american desire for independence
    6·1 answer
  • MULTIPLE CHOICE!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • Which is true of the election of 1868
    5·1 answer
  • Why are monopolies problematic? What are 2-3 issues with monopolies?
    14·1 answer
  • How did affirmative action help African Americans get good jobs
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a reason World War II began?
    5·2 answers
  • Following the American Revolution, what did Congress fear about a strong central government? O laws would be passed to prevent p
    7·1 answer
  • HEEELPPP
    6·2 answers
  • Help plz:))) I’ll mark u BRAINLIEST
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!