Tim earns $31 after 2 hours, $46.5 after three hours,

Mathematics

1 answer:

sladkih [1.3K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The clue here is to determine how much he makes in 1 hour, then see if that amount works for 2 hours and 3 hours. If we know that he makes $31 in 2 hours, then 31/2 is $15.50. And $15.50 times 2 hours is $31, and $15.50 times 3 hours is $46.50. So the equation that represents the amount of money Tim makes is y = 15.5x, where y is the amount of money he makes when he works x number of hours at $15.50 per hour.

You might be interested in

PLS HELP!!!! I need help in algebra, no links, no stealing points, and only correct answers or you will be reported!!! I AM GIVI

exis [7]

Answer:

D is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

multiple the exponents when the equation is in parenthesis like that! and do 3 cubed which equals 27.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A function f has the property that f(x-y)=f(x)/(y) f(y) does not equal zero if f (8)=256and f(5)=32 what is the value of f(3)

Dvinal [7]

Answer:

shdhhsjsjkalaixhxjalos

3 0

2 years ago

Calculate had a net income of 5 million dollars in 2010, while a small competing company, Computate, had a

Julli [10]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

a) see the attached spreadsheet (table)

b) Calculate, for a 10-year horizon; Computate for a longer horizon.

c) Year 13; no

Step-by-step explanation:

a) The attached table shows net income projections for the two companies. Calculate's increases by 0.5 million each year; Computate's increases by 15% each year. The result is rounded to the nearest dollar.

b) After year 4, Computate's net income is increasing by more than 0.5 million per year, so its growth is faster and getting faster yet. However, in the first 10 years, Calculate's net income remains higher than that of Computate. If we presume that some percentage of net income is returned to investors, then Calculate may provide a better return on investment.

The scenario given here is only interested in the first 10 years. However, beyond that time frame (see part C), we find that Computate's income growth far exceeds that of Calculate.

c) Extending the table through year 13, we see that Computate's net income exceeds Calculate's in that year. It continues to remain higher as long as the model remains valid.