Answer:
Carlos Marighella
Explanation:
Carlos Marighella is a Brazilian who is considered to be the leading theoretician of urban terrorism, Marighella's theories on urban guerrilla warfare considered cities as a key point of support for the peasant's armed rebellion. He was an advocate of urban guerrilla warfare as means to assist a larger scale rural uprising, the Tupamaros modelled their operational guidelines on this principle and focused nearly all their attacks and attention on the capital of Uruguay which is an urban settlement with some vague commitments to support rural movements and with an intention of using urban insurgency to spank a more general rural setting.
Answer:
$664,000
Explanation:
The computation of the budgeted total manufacturing cost is shown below:
Budgeted total manufacturing costs is
= Fixed cost + Variable cost
= $24,000 + ($16 × 40,000 linear feet of block)
= $24,000 + $640,000
= $664,000
We simply added the fixed cost and the variable cost so that the total budgeted manufacturing cost could come
Answer: Crystalline solids
Ionic solids
Molecular solids
Network covalent solids
Metallic solids
Amorphous solids
Explanation:
Answer:
of changes in the elements of the accounting equation. A useful way to conceptualize the accounting equation is that the left side (assets), "is what the Owner has" and the right side (liabilities + owner's equity) "is the method by which the Owner obtained the asset"
Explanation:
Answer:
According to McNeely, Wagner had to choose between seeking the remaining payment ($250,000 x 1/3) or keeping the timber.
This was a real case: "<em>Glen WAGNER and Bonnie Wagner, Respondents, v. Theodore R. McNEELY, Appellant. (96 CV 0525; CA A100217)
, July 07, 1999</em>"
The Court of Appeals of Oregon ruled that due to usage and customs of the timber industry in Oregon, there was nothing illegal in the plaintiff (Wagner) keeping the timber and seeking the payment. It was a very technical issue regarding two different rules that seem to be contradictory (ORS 72.7090 and ORS 72.7190). The court actually decided not to rule on this issue, so the lower court's decision remained.