Answer:
d) This is a completely randomized design with two explanatory variables (factors).
Step-by-step explanation:
Explanatory variables are independent variables.
In this case, I prepared two explanatory variables, which are : (i)30-second ad
(ii) 60-second ad,
Then, the explanatory variables were assigned to 4 treatment groups, and each variable is done once or thrice.
All subjects are assigned randomly to all treatment groups, with each treatment group seeing one. We can conclude that this is a completely randomized design with two explanatory variables.
Answer:
Btm Left
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
c = 100, a = 50, s = 20
Step-by-step explanation:
following information is missing from the question
6c + 7a + 2s = 990
3c + 3a + 4s = 430
2c + 4a + 4s = 480
If you solve the equation by putting in the values given in the option you will deduce that only option d matches LHS to the RHS
Lets see how,
6c + 7a + 2s = 990
where, c = 100, a = 50, s = 20
6(100) + 7(50) + 2(20) = 990
600 + 750 + 40 = 990
990 = 990 hence true
2c + 4a + 4s = 480 where, c = 100, a = 50, s = 20
2 (100) + 4 ( 50) + 4 (20) = 480
200 + 250 + 80 = 480
See for the other option too with the same steps done above to have a more clear understanding :)
I’ll be honest, I have no idea what you are trying to say.
0.6 x 0.2 = 12 and .9 - .12 = .78
It may be confusing because the decimals aren’t like whole numbers.
