The statement that describes the distinction between British and French rule in Africa is D. France used direct rule, while Britain used indirect rule.
It should be noted that the main difference between the way the French and the British ruled African countries was that while the French used direct rule, the British used indirect rule.
The indirect rule implies a form of government whereby the governed people have certain legal, administrative, and other powers. While the British still have certain powers over the people they ruled, the French were direct in their approach.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25555071
Because it was the largest mass murder/bombing in Oklahoma history.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the "Federalists," since the Federalists' policies were far more in line with businesses such as this as opposed to rural, agrarian farmers. </span></span>
<span>President Theodore Roosevelt’s policies toward Latin America were evidence of his beliefs in </span>intervention when American business interests were threatened.
Strategic location was a major reason why Constantine moved his capital to Byzantium. <span>It was easy to defend, it was surrounded by three sides of water. They had walls to protect from sea intruders and invasions and They stood as crossroads of Europe and Asia, and linked many trade routes from the west to the east. This aloud a major trading population, and made the city and some of its people very wealthy.</span>
