According to Malthusian theory of population, population increases in a geometrical ratio, whereas food supply increases in an arithmetic ratio. This disharmony would lead to widespread poverty and starvation, which would only be checked by natural occurrences such as disease, high infant mortality, famine, war or moral restraint. His main contribution is in the agricultural sector. According to this theory there are two steps to control the population: preventative and positive checks. Preventative means control in birth rate, and uses of different methods to control birth; and positive checks means natural calamities, war, etc. His theory was wrong because Malthus only considered two factors when he established his basic graph: food supply and population growth. Other factors such as improvements in technology proved him wrong. He was right at his time but development made him wrong. If it wasn't for outside influences on population growth and food supply, his mathematical reasoning which proved his theory and was right. I HOPED THIS HELPED
It b because it was stigma
An ordinary citizen might want to limit the pollution produced by various buildings. The best option for saving the environment would be to find other ways to consume raw resources. Thus, limiting the amount of pollution.
<em>Ans</em><em>:</em><em>-</em>
Explanation:
- limited, because not everyone serves in parliament
- limited, because citizens have a say over who serves in government***
- unlimited, because citizens do not pick the prime minister
- unlimited, because everyone has the right to vote
<span>The crime of bribery occurs at the moment that the money exchanges hands. In reality, both parties in the scenario (Mia and Nevin), could be charged with bribery. Bribery is the offer and acceptance of something valuable in order to alter an outcome, resulting in corruption. Mia offered and Nevin accepted, making them both guilty of this crime.</span>