The economic reason for exploration was to get the resources in the area while the religious reasons was due to the spread of the Christian religion.
<h3>What is exploration?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the period that the Europeans came to the Americas and took over the control of the areas and the resources that they had.
There are several reasons for exploration of North America by theses people. Economically, the area had natural resources such as gold. The Europeans were interested in these resources. Also the Europeans were hoping to get more Christian converts as well
Read more on exploration here: brainly.com/question/16762065
#SPJ1
Comercio y mercadotecnia???
Answer:
Tomogachi can be described as a handheld digital pet made in Japan.
Explanation:
<span>A traditional phone message includes the following cues of a face-to-face conversation
: </span>the words that are spoken to convey the message and the voice (the tone, inflection, and volume) of the voice used to deliver the message.
Telephone or email communication lacks important nonverbal cues: the visual aids (pictures, videos, and charts) that help understand the message and facial expressions.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
