Answer:
The correct answer is BC → A, A does not hold over S. we noticed the tuples (1 ,2 ,3 ) and (4 ,2 ,3) which can hold over S)
Explanation:
Solution
No, since in this case the instance of S is provided. so such particular dependencies are unable to breach through such instance, but unable to tell which the dependencies hold towards S.
A functional dependency holds towards only when a relation forms a statement regarding the complete allowed instances of relation.
The answer to your question is,
True.
-Mabel <3
The answer will be google docs since it depends on a web and its an application. hope it helps
Answer:
i dont know anything about them only that the bear is the ducks son and the duck is the fox mom.
Explanation:
