Explanation:
The district coordination committee is elected by the District Assembly, which consists of the Heads and Deputy Heads of all the rural municipalities and Mayors and Deputy Mayors of all the municipalities in the district.
Agree, because you should never give up especially when you're treated unfairly.
Answer:
personal, comfortable, and reciprocal.
Explanation:
According to my research on political parties and their relationships, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the relationship among these groups can be described as personal, comfortable, and reciprocal. This is because they are groups that work very closely with one another and need to ford a certain comfortable environment of trust since each one does something for the other and vice versa.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Correct answer choice is:
<h2>C. Peter Irons' anti-establishment political views (evidenced in pacifism and socialism) may influence his scholarship.</h2><h3>Explanation:</h3>
Peter Irons received the full scholarship in Political Science program at the Boston College. Soon after the completion of his graduation in Sociology, he was jailed due to his contradictory statements to the army. In the jail, he was concorded with the Zinns thinking. Zinn's was the instructor of political science at Boston College and composed the book at Race and Vietnam War. Peter send the application to study the doctoral program in Political Science at Boston College under his guidance.
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
