1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tatyana61 [14]
3 years ago
8

Any adult in your life will remember the OJ Simpson trial. It was televised on national tv and everyone followed it closely.

History
2 answers:
ss7ja [257]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Along with the fact that OJ was convicted for the murder of his wife, he was very famous and looked up to by many at the time. The case was followed on television and spoken about so widely in the news due to his status and the extremity of the crime he was accused of. The true question of whether murder trials should be in the media and on national TV is a very subjective matter. I believe in this case, entertainment of the people was chosen over privacy and proffesionality.

Explanation:

Firdavs [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

give brainllest if correct

Explanation:

They broadcasted it on tvs all around the globe. It was one of the most important trials in the history of the world. This was the moment tha murder case was set to order. It was either life or death for the criminals of the murder case.

You might be interested in
Why did roosevelt's republican challenger alfred landon fail in his bid for the presidency in 1936? his traditional urban cathol
frozen [14]

<span>Roosevelt’s Republican challenger Alfred Landon failed in his bid for the presidency in 1936 because h</span><span>e faced a powerful new political coalition that would deliver republicans plenty of defeats for the next few decades. Franklin Delano Roosevelt was exceptionally popular among the electorate thus posing quite an uphill task to Alfred Landon.</span>

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The 4th Amendment was included in the Constitution because of colonial experience with who/what?
leonid [27]

Answer:In modern society, it is easy to forget where many of our freedoms come from. It is also dangerous to turn a blind eye to history. Civilizations, military commanders, and leaders of nations have ignored history with devastating results.

Because the 4th Amendment is so vitally important to America, it deserves a look into the history behind its inception into the Constitution. The 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution was added as part of the Bill of Rights on December 15, 1791. It deals with protecting people from the searching of their homes and private property without properly executed search warrants. The 4th Amendment specifically provides:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

The Founders believed that freedom from government intrusion into one’s home was a natural right (one granted from God) and fundamental to liberty. The idea that citizens should be protected from unreasonable searches and seizures goes back far into English history. In 1604, Sir Edward Coke first identified this right. He said that “The house of every one is to him as his castle and fortress, as well for his defence against injury and violence as for his repose.”

During the Colonial era, the King of England looked at the American colonies as simply a financial investment. Britain passed numerous revenue collection bills aimed at generating as much money from the colonists as possible. Obviously, the colonists resented this act by the King and began smuggling operations in order to circumvent the custom taxes imposed by the British Crown.

In response, King George began the use of the conveniently worded “writs of assistance.” These were legal search warrants that were extremely broad and general in scope. British agents could obtain a writ of assistance to search any property they believed might contain contraband goods. They could actually enter someone’s property or home with no notice and without any reason. Agents could interrogate anyone about their use of customed goods and force cooperation of any person. These types of searches and seizures became an egregious affront to the people of the colonies.

These actions by the British Crown would be one the precipitating factors leading to the American Revolution and the eventual forming of our Constitution.

When the 4th Amendment became part of the Constitution, it was originally only applied to the federal government. Later, it was applied to the states through the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Of course, there are many common sense exceptions to the 4th Amendment right to have a properly executed search warrant issued before a search or seizure of private property can be conducted. They are too numerous to list in this column. However, two common examples are (1) a police officer may conduct a pat down search of someone if he or she has observed someone engaging in behavior that would give the officer reasonable, articulable suspicion that a crime has or is being committed; and (2) if a police officer sees someone committing a crime, or believes that he or she has probable cause to suspect someone has committed a crime, the officer may arrest the suspect without a warrant.

Looking back at the reasoning behind liberties in cultures helps to preserve freedoms. It is only when we become disinterested or even indifferent to our Founders that we take a dangerous path toward civilizational decline. We cannot forget why Americans enjoy legal rights like the 4th Amendment.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What happened to donner party <br> im giving brainliest and 11 points
Zigmanuir [339]
On december 16th, 1846, 15 of the members of the Donner Party strapped on makeshift snowshoes and tried to walk out of the mountains to try to find help. After several days trying to find help they were left starving and on the verge of collapse.
7 0
3 years ago
¿Que hechos sirvieron de justificativo importante para que Rosas asumiera como gobernador de Bs As con Facultades Extraordinaria
Wittaler [7]

Juan Manuel de Rosas que había tenido facultades extraordinarias en su primer mandato, asumió por segunda vez como gobernador de Buenos Aires, en 1835, también con una suma de poderes que implicaba el ejercicio de los tres poderes del Estado (Legislativo, Ejecutivo y Judicial). Los hechos que propiciaron su segundo mandato fueron:

  1. La muerte de Facundo Quiroga que provocó un clima de inestabilidad y violencia.
  2. La renuncia de Manuel Vicente Maza en marzo de ese año.

La Legislatura de Buenos Aires convocó a Rosas y le propuso que asumiera la gobernación. Él aceptó pero bajo la condición de que se le otorgase la "suma de poderes".

<u>Sin embargo, la suma del poder público se le otorgó con el compromiso de:</u>

  1. Conservar, defender y proteger la iglesia Católica en Argentina.
  2. Sostener la causa nacional de la Federación.
  3. La suma del poder público duraría el tiempo que el Gobernador considerara necesario.

Explanation:

Juan Manuel de Rosas, who has had extraordinary powers in his first period in power, assumed for the second time as Governor of Buenos Aires also with a 'sum of powers' that implied the exercise of the three powers of the State (Legislative, Executive, and Judicial). The events that led to his second period in power were:

  1. Facundo Quiroga's death, which caused a climate of instability and violence.
  2. Manuel Vicente Maza's resignation, in March of that year.

The Legislature of Buenos Aires summoned Rosas and proposed that he assume the governorship and he accepted on the condition of being granted the "sum of powers."

<u>However, the sum of the public power was granted with the commitment of:</u>

  1. Preserve, defend, and protect the Catholic Church in Argentina.
  2. Support the national cause of the Federation.
  3. The sum of public power would last as long as the Governor considered necessary.
3 0
3 years ago
According to Livingstone, what is the chief’s reaction to Christianity? What is the reaction of the rest of the tribe? Overall,
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

His reaction is that he believed that no one would like to convert because they were hungry with no energy. Because the majority of missionaries set out and spoke the same language so people converted.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which nation would probably have objected to the english exploration of the great lakes region?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the deflation or decrease in the money supply in the late 1800s affect farmers?
    14·1 answer
  • Contributing money and registering voters are examples of ways citizens can __________. a. run for public office b. support camp
    5·1 answer
  • What is the main difference between archaeologists and anthropologists?
    6·1 answer
  • The Aztecs founded their city<br>a. Manchu Picchu<br>b. Cuzco,<br>c.Tenoctitlan<br>d. Peten​
    13·1 answer
  • What did a castle serve as during times of war? A. a church B. a town square C. a fort D. a school
    7·1 answer
  • The first French troops sent to help the colonists fought against the British in:
    7·2 answers
  • Why did Einstein develop the cosmological constant
    11·1 answer
  • The legend of Romulus and Remus is told to explain what event?
    8·2 answers
  • What are the top 5 Causes of the Civil War?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!