The first one!
Bob's stocks are worth more than leslie's.
Answer:
Consider the following analysis.
Explanation:
The manager's assumption is that the employee work only for their own benefits and they need immediate punishment for poor work, intermediation, and minute-level supervision. This proves that he uses Theory X.
The upper management, on the other hand, is trying to initiate consultation with the employees before bringing out any improvement plan in the business process. This type of management style implicitly assumes that the employees are motivated and self-directed. This is Theory Y.
So, the first option should be correct.
Equity theory is something not contextual here. Equity theory works on the reduction of perceived inequality in the input and output of the employees as a means of motivation.
This one would be IRS.
For example, if<span> you end up paying for personal property taxes to your local government, the IRS would allow you to claim a deduction for it on your federal tax return~</span>
Answer:
-$4,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount of cash flow from investing activities is shown below:
= Paid a $4,000 cash to purchase land
Since the land is purchase for cash so the amount is to be shown in the investing activities in a negative value as the purchase is the outflow of cash
So the same is relevant
Answer:
B) John can expect to earn $120,000 in revenue more by expanding, but that is less than the cost of expansion, $150,000.
Explanation:
If John decides not to expand his expected revenue will be = ($100,000 x 50%) + ($300,000 x 50%) = $50,000 + $150,000 = $200,000
If John decides to expand his expected revenue will be = ($100,000 x 30%) + ($300,000 x 30%) + ($500,000 x 40%) = $30,000 + $90,000 + $200,000 = $320,000
If John decides to expand, his revenue will increase by $120,000.
Since we are not told if John's revenue is yearly or not, I assume that it includes a whole business or project cycle. The cost of expanding is $150,000 while the incremental revenue is only $120,000.
