Answer:
Reasons for irrational behaviour : Political brand name establishment in favour of candidate, enhancing brand loyalty towards.
More knowledgable public : Would value candidate working on real development, rather than mere brand name.
Explanation:
Political elections are determined by the public's impressions of the candidates rather than the candidates' views on the issues.
Reason(s) of such irrational voting behaviour could be : The candidate having established a personal brand image of himself/ herself, specially in a particular community group. This makes the people of the community being 'brand loyal' towards their candidate, irrespective of his or her ideologies. It is also possible to make that political personality (candidate) an important part of 'national image' or 'community leader image', which reinforce support for the candidate, irrespective of person perception and attitudes.
If public were more knowledgeable about factors that affect person perception and attitudes : The political support would not be based on lineaged political brand names. It would rather be earned on the basis of candidate's performance for socio - economic, political upliftment. This would give power in the hands of deserving politicians & create a message that 'real work' & not just 'name' is needed to gain political success
<span>Burning the flag is a way of protesting
usually most forms of protest related to freedom of speech
. So if they were to ban it means that they would take away part of our freedom of speech. and we canonot even speak or protest against them
hope it helps</span>
The correct answer is Plessy Vs. Ferguson. In the landmark case Plessy vs. Ferguson, it was ruled that segregation of facilities was constitutional as long as those facilities were equal in quality. This is were the term "Separate but Equal" comes from. However, during the case Brown vs. The Board of Education it was ruled that racial segregation violated the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution. It was this ruling that rendered the ruling in Plessy vs. Ferguson invalid because the ruling was unconstitutional.
Maybe because of the different cultures and art tendencies that had to have varied in different regions of Greece?
According to Eugene Pauline, <u>Anti-organizational street cops</u> are officers who have very strong positive attitudes toward citizens and very negative attitudes toward supervisors
Eugene Pauline was a criminologist who tried to classify the police officers based on their behavior towards citizens, procedural, supervisors, guidelines, tactics, and police functions.
He found out that among several other police officers, Anti-organizational street cops have very strong positive attitudes toward citizens and very negative attitudes toward supervisors.
They respect the law enforcement processes. Although they favor selective enforcement but not aggressive patrol tactics. That is why they are said to have positive attitude towards citizens.
You can learn more about Eugene Pauline and his classification from
brainly.com/question/26732245
#SPJ4
