Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coefficient between the variables h(height in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) is 0.202
Sample size n=40
Level of significane alpha = 0.01
Create null and alternate hypothesis as:
H0: r=0
Ha: r not equal 0
(Two tailed test at 1% significance level)
Sample r = 0.202
r difference = 0.202
test statistic t = 
df =n-2 =38
t critical value for 0.01 and df =38 is 2.704
Since our test statistic lies below 2.704, we accept null hypothesis
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
The answer is C.
x=2
y=-30
(2;-30)
Answer:
20 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
Think of a large cone, 30 cm high, and a small cone of x height.
The scale factor of a volume of the cube of the scale factor of linear dimensions.
The cubic root of 1/27 is 1/3.
This means that the height of the small cone is 1/3 the height of the large cone.
The large cone has height 30 cm.
The small cone has height 10 cm.
30 cm - 10 cm = 20 cm
Answer: 20 cm
-1/4 the negative reciprocal of the slope of the red line
The answer is D
This is because if for every $50 he saves $5, and he has saved a total of $500, you can set up a proportion to find out how much money he has saved at that point.
The proportion is as follows:
50/5 == 500/x
x is equivalent to the amount of money he has saved
You can cross multiply to get the following equation:
50x == 2500
To isolate x, you must divide both sides by 50, giving you an answer of:
x = 50
This is the same as option D
