Answer:
Any enumeration of business processes should strive for a reasonably detailed outcome, which needs to be aligned with the organization’s specific goals of process management. For most organizations, as a rule of thumb, this will boil down to a dozen to a couple of dozens of business processes. Very large and diversified organizations might be better off with identifying a couple of hundred processes. To illustrate this: Within a multi-national investment firm, which employs close to 3,000 staff and holds assets in the range of € 300 million 120 different business processes have been identified. To each of these business processes a process owner is assigned, who oversees the performance of the process and monitors the achievement of its objectives in terms of customer satisfaction, profitability, and accountability. Detailed process models are kept up-to-date, both as a means for documenting planned changes to any process and for satisfying the requirements of financial authorities. By contrast, for a small medical clinic in the Netherlands, which employs medical specialists, nurses, and administrative staff, 10 different treatment processes have been identified. A few of these have been mapped in the form of process models and are now in the process of being automated with a business process management system. For all other processes, it is sufficient to be aware of the distinctive treatment options they can provide to different patient categories.
Answer:
SmartSC
The economic order quantity (EOQ) for Supplier A is:
= c) 253
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Supplier A Supplier B
Price per unit $30 $6
Annual unit demand 7,200 3,000
Annual holding cost $9 $1.80 ($6 * 30%)
Ordering cost $40
Economic order quantity for Supplier A = square root of (2 * D * S)/H
where D = Annual demand in units
S = Ordering cost per order
H = Holding cost per unit
= square root of (2 * 7,200 * $40)/$9
= square root of 64,000
= 253
This is not enough information to answer this question.
Answer: Yes it does.
Explanation:
The Statute of Frauds holds that there are some contracts including real estate contracts that need to be in written form and then signed to be binding. Some of those contracts include, contracts of sale of goods worth more than $500 as well as contracts that cannot be completed within a year.
We can agree that the trees and top soil are definitely over $500 in value and so this falls under the Statute.
The main bone of contention here however, is probably if the Electronic signature that Hardell used to signed the memorandum entitles the aggrement to legal protection under the Statue of Frauds which requires a signature.
The answer is yes.
The United States Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act is a federal law. A main provision of this Act is to give electronic signatures the same significance as handwritten signatures. This law is meant to apply to wherever US Federal law applies including states, and US territories. States generally have the right to either accept this law or follow a similar one called the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (‘UETA’) which was passed in 1999 and bestows upon Electronic contracts, similar status as paper contracts.
The Electronic signature used by Hardell therefore falls under the Statute of Frauds.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The sooner a stock turnover happens, the more profitable a business operates while enjoying a greater return on its capital and other resources. The stock turnover rate, otherwise known as inventory changes, provides insight into the productivity of a business, both actual and comparative, while turning its money into revenues and profits.
For Example:
When two organizations do have 20 million in stock, the one which sells everything in 30 days has good cash balance and lower incidence than the one which requires 60 days to do.
