Answer:
the 2nd and 3rd choice are correct
Explanation:
Answer:
The easiest should be getting a proposal by 3/4 of those in both houses of the congress. This should be the easiest because you don't need 3/4 of all members elected, but rather the 3/4 of those who are there if a quorum exists. This means that a high majority of the quorum is needed and it is not difficult to get all these people to be there and to vote for what your party wants if you're in the majority.
The most difficult should be the second option which requires the state legislatures of 3/4 of states to accept the proposal and send it to congress. This means that almost 40 states have to adopt the proposal in their own state legislatures which is extremely difficult to do and is extremely time consuming.
When an amendment proposal is adopted, then the easiest way is for the 3/4 of state legislatures to ratify the amendment before it becomes a part of the constitution. This is a very time consuming process but it has been the way for the amendments to become ratified almost every time in history that an amendment proposal was adopted
The second, more difficult option, should be forming state conventions in which the conventions have to ratify the amendment proposal instead of the state legislatures. This was only used once in the history of the United States. Which mode of ratification would be used depends on what the congress chooses as allowed by the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
Answer:
They developed standerdized writing
Explanation:
Many factors led to the French Revolution. The Revolution was followed by the Seven Years' War, which lasted between 1756 and 1763 and resulted in victory for England. Unfortunately, France's debt increased. France's government faced an even tighter financial situation, when it gave financial support to the American Revolution. Taxes had also increased, and the people of France rose with anger.
<em>Hope this helped! </em>
<em>Also can I get brainliest by any chance?</em>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The difference between government solutions to problems and individual or community solutions is the following.
Government solutions are focused on resolving broader issues in different parts of the country that benefits the majority of the people. It could be, for instance, the construction of important infrastructure such as building a dam that benefits many states. Or a public highway that connects many towns throughout the state or nationally. On the other hand, individual solutions tend to onñy benefit the people or the individual that solicit help to resolve a particular problem in its area or community. It is local-focused.
