<h2>This is an example of "externship"</h2>
Explanation:
Externship is the training program or a training given to the employee temporarily to upgrade his skills.
There is a difference between "internship and externship".
Internship is given to a beginner. It's like on-the job training where they will be paid some minimum amount as salary.
Externship is for the person who is experienced. This would give practical experience. Here apply classroom lessons in the real word. We also get a chance to meet other professional.
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the increase or decrease in the retained earnings will be calculated as:
= (10,000,000 - 400,000) × 15% × $15
= 9,600,000 × 0.15 × 15
= 21,600,000
The retained earnings will decrease by $21.6 million
The options given aren't correct.
The economic theory most likely to make a person oppose taxing imports is "<u>Laissez-faire"</u>
"Laissez-faire" is an economic theory that opposes the government's involvement in economic affairs.
Imposing a tax on imports can have implications for local businesses.
Thus, this theory gained popularity in the USA in the 18th century opposing the government's intervention in economic affairs.
It's a French phrase that means "Let us do," because people believed that imports and exports should be managed by states and not the central government.
Scholars believed that economies go down when governments start imposing taxes on imports.
If you need to learn more about Laissez-faire, click here:
brainly.com/question/23946713
#SPJ4
Answer:
goods produced abroad and sold domestically.
Explanation:
Exports are goods produced in the domestic economy and sold abroad.
Quotas limits placed on the quantity of goods leaving a country.
Countries trade goods for which they have comparative advantage and not absolute advantage.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
$5,000 taxable
Explanation:
In this scenario, the tax consequence of withdrawal will be $5,000 taxable. This is because annuity contract contributions are not tax-deductible, meaning that the original contribution of $10,000 has already been taxed. Therefore in this situation all $5,000 will be taxable, luckily since the individual is over the age of 59 1/2 then the distribution is not subjected to a 10% penalty tax for premature distribution.
