Answer:
No.
Explanation:
The contract is no longer valid because of changes in the condition of offer. By the operation of law, the occurrence of certain events will automatically terminate an agency relationship. Since Mark expressly stated that the reason he was selling the estate was because he has lost so much money, any significant cash inflow to Mark apart from the sale of the estate will ultimately affect his decision to sell. As such, the lottery he won is a cash flow and since a vital condition for selling the estate has been breached. The contract is to be declared invalid.
Answer:
b) false
Explanation:
In the case of theory that developed by MM in this the investor have no need for concering with respect to the dividend policy of the company as in this the sell option is there with regard to the equity portfolio when they need the cash
So according to the given situation, the given statement is false
hence the option b is correct
Answer:
The options are given below:
a) punctuation
b) interpretation
c) perceptuation
d) conjugation
e) intrepidation
The correct option is A. Punctuation.
Explanation:
To punctuate a communication refers to the interpretation of an ongoing sequence of events by determining that one event is the cause and the resulting event is the response. In a situation with communication, if one thing happens, something else always happens.
In the scenario above, both Shannon and Roger are exemplifying the theory of punctuation, because they each think that their actions are as a result of the actions of the other person.
Answer:
It will be:
a) Address and date
b) salutation
c) Body of letter.
d) Conclusion.
Explanation:
The first one is address.
The second one is one's greetings.
The third one is: one's purpose of writing the letter.
The last is the rounding up of the letter.
Fewer injuries/workers compensation claims. Safer workplace. Greater comfort. Higher productiviity
