The answer is "access to good schools".
A retail store is a position of business normally claimed and worked by a retailer yet now and again possessed and worked by a producer or by somebody other than a retailer in which stock is sold fundamentally to ultimate customers. Good schools are something which cannot have secondary consideration.
Answer:
1. Positive Externality ; 2. Negative Externality ; 3. Positive Externality.
Explanation:
Externalities are benefits or harms to other parties , without payment received or made for them respectively.
Positive Externalities : Externalities positively effecting others. Eg-Education
Negative Externalities : Externalities positively effecting others . Eg-Pollution.
1. Bridal Shop's signage facelift creates benefit for other strip mall businesses also (better business visibility), without former receiving money & latter paying money.
2. Local church celebration creates benefit for all attendants (recreational benefit) ,without former receiving money & latter paying money.
3. Local School bus ramp construction creates harm for commuters of that area (traffic inconvenience) , without former paying money & latter receiving money
Answer: 0.89
Explanation: add the 82% and 47% then subtract the 40, answer is 89.
Answer:
The correct answer is (A)
Explanation:
Commercial finance is another way to generate funds, but they come with certain drawbacks compared to commercial banks. Commercial finance usually give loans to customers who are interested in more risky investments. The interest they charge is usually higher which can only be paid if a client invests in riskier investments to earn higher returns.
Answer:
this case tells us about some sort of pressures that accounts feel when financial statements are needed urgently
Explanation:
1) As for using low estimates, this step was wrong on her part. she should have been upfront in her estimates. for the items that she could not estimate there should have been an indication that such items were still under review, instead of doing what she did to give the financial estimate a good look. Using guesses or deliberately using low estimates was a bad idea, GAAP would never condone that.
She should have met with the president and let him know that finalization of the financial statements would not possible within the time frame that he has given. She could have also explain that such delays are normal and she would have given estimates of when the draft internal copy would be made available to him. such steps she took could have resulted in serious consequences for the company
2) I would not inflate or deflate the figures on purpose to make financial statements look better. If it is time to present the draft and final year-end financial statements I will have to tell the truth on the numbers and estimations used and also the reasons for that. i would have explained the constraints that i was facing. if i was still being pressurized by the president, i would have no choice than to call it quits instead of going against the ethics of my profession, since there are both ethical and legal implications to not giving inaccurate financial statements.
