Answer:
The correct answer would be option A, The lump sum is always better.
Explanation:
If I would have to give advice to my friend who is in the same situation as i was in some time back, I would recommend him to go for the Lump sum choice. This is because of the fact that the interest rate compounded in three years payment schedule will result in the less value of what I am getting today. Accepting the lump sum value in contrast with accepting the yearly payments on 9% interest rate would be better off because it has more value at present.
Answer:
Bad debt expense (Dr.) $68,930
Allowance for Doubtful Debt (Cr.) $68,930
Explanation:
Accounts Receivable :
Balance $948,000
Add: Sales $3,609,930
Less: Sales returns $51,000
Less: Collections $2,756,000
Less: Write offs $97,000
Add: Recovery of old Bad debts $28,000
Adjusted Balance $1,653,930
Bad Debts :
Balance $78,000
Less: Allowance for doubtful debts $97,000
Less: Recovery $28,000
Adjusted Balance $9,000
The answer is D. 10-20 seconds.
You can accomplish your business objective with the aid of cost-per-click and cost-per-mile ad solutions. No recurring or up-front costs. Ads may be made quickly. Ad experience is not necessary. aid in reaching more consumers. CPC advertisements. The expense is in your hands. Types: Amazon home delivery and Amazon DSP.
Provide value to customers by delivering high-quality goods to their homes Boost Whole Foods' standing as a source of superior food Growing rivalry between groceries home delivery services further disperse the grocery market Which of the following best represents the situation Amazon and Whole Foods would be in if adoption quickens as the technology is better understood and used by the general market? Amazon will have to buy more and more rivals in order to stay competitive. Their situation won't change at all.
Learn more about delivery here.
brainly.com/question/28062155
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. $965.74
b. $939.11
Explanation:
In this question we use the Present value formula i.e shown in the attachment below:
1. Given that,
Future value = $1,000
Rate of interest = 6.5%
NPER = 4 years
PMT = $1,000 × 5.5% = $55
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the price would be $965.74
2. Given that,
Future value = $1,000
Rate of interest = 6.5%
NPER = 8 years
PMT = $1,000 × 5.5% = $55
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the price would be $939.11
