All categories

3 years ago

Managerial accounting information is generally prepared for a. shareholders b.creditors c.managers d.regulatory agencies

Business

1 answer:

amm18123 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Correct option is (c)

Explanation:

Managerial accounting reports are prepared for the internal use by managers within different departments in the organization. They may or may not be published for external users like creditors or customers.

These reports need not comply to any established authorities like GAAP or IFRS. They are used by managers for various decision making purposes, so they can be prepared as per the manager's convenience.

You might be interested in

During July, the equivalent units of direct materials added to the product worked on by Department A amounted to a total of 90,0

dybincka [34]

Answer:

Cost of ending inventory =$15,000

Explanation:

Given:

Direct material = 90,000

beginning Inventory = 20,000

Completed Inventory = 60,000

Ending Inventory = 10,000

Total cost of direct materials = $135,000

Computation:

Cost of ending inventory = Ending Inventory × Per Item cost

Cost of ending inventory = 10,000 × $1.50

Cost of ending inventory =$15,000

Working Note:

Cost per unit = Cost of direct materials / Units in direct materials

Cost per unit = $135,000 / 90,000

Cost per unit = $1.50

7 0

3 years ago

A monopolist finds that a person’s demand for its product depends on the person’s age. The inverse demand function of someone of

KiRa [710]

Explanation:

A manufacturer of computer memory chips produces chips in lots of 1000. If nothing has gone wrong in the manufacturing process, at most 7 chips each lot would be defective, but if something does go wrong, there could be far more defective chips. If something goes wrong with a given lot, they discard the entire lot. It would be prohibitively expensive to test every chip in every lot, so they want to make the decision of whether or not to discard a given lot on the basis of the number of defective chips in a simple random sample. They decide they can afford to test 100 chips from each lot. You are hired as their statistician.

There is a tradeoff between the cost of eroneously discarding a good lot, and the cost of warranty claims if a bad lot is sold. The next few problems refer to this scenario.

Problem 8. (Continues previous problem.) A type I error occurs if (Q12)

Problem 9. (Continues previous problem.) A type II error occurs if (Q13)

Problem 10. (Continues previous problem.) Under the null hypothesis, the number of defective chips in a simple random sample of size 100 has a (Q14) distribution, with parameters (Q15)

Problem 11. (Continues previous problem.) To have a chance of at most 2% of discarding a lot given that the lot is good, the test should reject if the number of defectives in the sample of size 100 is greater than or equal to (Q16)

Problem 12. (Continues previous problem.) In that case, the chance of rejecting the lot if it really has 50 defective chips is (Q17)

Problem 13. (Continues previous problem.) In the long run, the fraction of lots with 7 defectives that will get discarded erroneously by this test is (Q18)

Problem 14. (Continues previous problem.) The smallest number of defectives in the lot for which this test has at least a 98% chance of correctly detecting that the lot was bad is (Q19)

(Continues previous problem.) Suppose that whether or not a lot is good is random, that the long-run fraction of lots that are good is 95%, and that whether each lot is good is independent of whether any other lot or lots are good. Assume that the sample drawn from a lot is independent of whether the lot is good or bad. To simplify the problem even more, assume that good lots contain exactly 7 defective chips, and that bad lots contain exactly 50 defective chips.

Problem 15. (Continues previous problem.) The number of lots the manufacturer has to produce to get one good lot that is not rejected by the test has a (Q20) distribution, with parameters (Q21)

Problem 16. (Continues previous problem.) The expected number of lots the manufacturer must make to get one good lot that is not rejected by the test is (Q22)

Problem 17. (Continues previous problem.) With this test and this mix of good and bad lots, among the lots that pass the test, the long-run fraction of lots that are actually bad is (Q23)

7 0

2 years ago

Katie Kwasi’s utility function is U(x1, x2) = 2(ln x1) + x2. Given her current income and the current relative prices, she consu

aniked [119]

Answer:

Katie Kwasi's Utility Function

The units of x1 that she will consume after the change in income is:

= 40 units of x1

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Katie Kwasi’s utility function, U(x1, x2) = 2(ln x1) + x2

Current consumption = 10 units of x1 and 15 units of x2

When her income doubles, with prices staying constant, Katie will consume:

= 2(2 * 10 of x1) + 15 of x2

= 40 units of x1 + 15 units of x2

Therefore, she will consume 40 units of x1 and 15 units of x2

b) The above function expresses mathematically Katie's utility to be a function of the units of x1 and x2 that she can consume, given her income constraint. If her income doubles, Katie will consume double units of x1 and the same units of x2 as she was consuming before the change in income.

4 0

3 years ago

Adams and Collin Enterprises expect earnings and dividends to grow at a rate of 25% for the next 4 years, after the growth rate

ollegr [7]

Answer:

the intrinsic value of the stock is 42.97

If the stock is priced at 40 dollars it would be a good idea to purchase the share as will provide a better yield than the cost of capital of 9.6%

Explanation:

First, we solve for the cost of equity using the CAPM:

$Ke= r_f + \beta (r_m-r_f)$

risk free = 0.03

market rate = 0.09

premium market = (market rate - risk free) = 0.055

beta(non diversifiable risk) = 1.2

$Ke= 0.03 + 1.2 (0.055)$

Ke = 0.09600

Now we solve for the intrinsic price using the gordon model

with multi-stage growth:

First, we calcualte the future dividends

grow rate Dividends

0 1.25

1 0.25 1.5625

2 0.25 1.953125

3 0.25 2.44140625

4 0.25 3.051757813

4 0.03 3.143310547

Now in the last year, we calcualte using the gordon model or constant grow:

$\frac{3.143310547}{0.096-0.03} = Intrinsic \: Value$

32.7128182

Now we calculate and add together the present value of each of this future cash flow to determnate the intrinsic value ofthe share:

$\frac{Principal}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV$

Present Value

1 1.5625 / (1+0.096)^1 = 1.425638686

2 1.953125 / (1+0.096)^2 = 1.625956531

and so on, giving the following values:

3 1.854421226

4 2.114987712

present value of the future dividends at 3% 22.67126448

Finally we add them and get:

42.97160726

8 0

3 years ago

A business provides its employees with varying amounts of vacation per year, depending on the length of employment. The estimate

natta225 [31]

Answer:

1. Vacation pay expense Dr. 3500

Vacation pay payable 3500

2. It is recorded at the company's balance sheet as the accrued liabililty at the liabilities portion.

3. The amount will be removed once the vacation pay is paid and is debited to income account.

4 0

3 years ago