1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Novay_Z [31]
3 years ago
15

About what year did emperor Constantine allow Christianity to become legal in the Roman Empire

History
1 answer:
abruzzese [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

313 AD

Explanation:

In 313 AD, the Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan, which accepted Christianity: 10 years later, it had become the official religion of the Roman Empire.

You might be interested in
Why did the young boys not believe Emmett Till when he showed them a picture of a white girl?
Vladimir [108]

Answer: found this on a wiki hope it helps. Emmett Louis Till (July 25, 1941 – August 28, 1955) was a 14-year-old African American who was lynched in Mississippi in 1955, after being accused of offending a white woman in her family's grocery store. The brutality of his murder and the fact that his killers were acquitted drew attention to the long history of violent persecution of African Americans in the United States. Till posthumously became an icon of the civil rights movement.[1]

Till was born and raised in Chicago, Illinois. During summer vacation in August 1955, he was visiting relatives near Money, in the Mississippi Delta region. He spoke to 21-year-old Carolyn Bryant, the white married proprietor of a small grocery store there. Although what happened at the store is a matter of dispute, Till was accused of flirting with or whistling at Bryant. In 1955, Bryant had testified that Till made physical and verbal advances. The jury did not hear Bryant's testimony, due to the judge ruling it inadmissible.[2][3] Decades later, historian Timothy Tyson interviewed Bryant and wrote a book in which he claimed that she had disclosed that she had fabricated part of the testimony regarding her interaction with Till, specifically the portion where she accused Till of grabbing her waist and uttering obscenities; "That part's not true," Tyson claimed that Bryant stated in a 2008 interview with him.[2][4][5] Till's interaction with Bryant, perhaps unwittingly if at all, violated the strictures of conduct for an African-American male interacting with a white woman in the Jim Crow-era South.[6] Several nights after the incident in the store, Bryant's husband Roy and his half-brother J.W. Milam were armed when they went to Till's great-uncle's house and abducted the boy. They took him away and beat and mutilated him before shooting him in the head and sinking his body in the Tallahatchie River. Three days later, Till's body was discovered and retrieved from the river.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The federalists wanted
inysia [295]
The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while theanti-Federalists<span> wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights—they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The </span>anti-federalists<span> demanded a bill of rights</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is there a historical debate surrounding the Great Wall of China?
11111nata11111 [884]

There's a great debate about the efficiency of the Great Wall of China.

There are many pros and cons that both sides might argue about if it was or wasn't worth it to build the great wall.

Cons.

1. Millions of people died to build the Great Wall.

2. The main reason the have the Wall built was to keep invaders (Mostly Mongols) out of China, but eventually, they found their way around the wall anyways.

3. Considering that it cost time, resources and lives, many consider that the Wall of China was a mistake and a waste.

on the other hand, here are some of the arguments pro the Wall.

1. Even thought eventually China was invaded, it did keep the nomads out of the walls for a long time.

2. The Mongols could have killed many more if the walls didn't keep them out for as long as it did.

3. In the end, the materials used to build the wall were cheap.

4. Finally, it became a historical landmark and still attracts visitors.

Until today, people still debate about the Great Wall of China and if it was or wasn't worth the cost.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What can you infer about the mongol empire from the map
son4ous [18]
Good game for you too good to win with a good chance to play
6 0
4 years ago
*
pishuonlain [190]

Answer:

Eastern and Western Europe.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did hitler change the german government and its leadership?
    9·1 answer
  • Was Thomas Paine a colonist?
    7·1 answer
  • North Korea was assisted in its war with South Korea by the armed forces of __________.
    9·1 answer
  • What humanist of Northern Europe wrote about his vision of an ideal society, in which people live in peace and harmony?
    14·1 answer
  • Longitude is a measurement of distance to the west or east of __________.
    14·1 answer
  • Powers held by the national government are called _______
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes the importance of the archaeological excavation of the Manis Masodon.
    12·1 answer
  • The Anglo settlers in Texas faced all of the following problems except:
    5·1 answer
  • What tactics did Gálvez employ a when attacking Pensacola? a. He laid siege to the city. b. They grew frustrated over spanish in
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is the concession? Question 6 options: The most recent regulation which has ignited a fierce debate is wh
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!