Dear Taylor.
This week I had to write an essay on the end of the Romanov dynasty and although this is an easy topic to find in books and on the internet, I would like to make my essay more diverse in terms of research source and that's when my sister recommended looking for a documentary about the Romanovs, which I did and gave me very good results.
The documentary told the whole story of the Romanov dynasty, until the murder of the last Tzar and his entire family. The documentary focused a lot on all the elements that led to the fall of the last Romanovs in addition to showing curiosities about the personal life of each member of the family.
The documentary helped me a lot to understand this phase of the history of Russia and how it impacted the whole government and society, but in addition, the documentary helped me to have a more humanistic view of family members and understand their anxieties, fears and injustice. Although the documentary showed me that the family needed to harness power, it also showed me that deep down they were just humans prone to mistakes like all of us and did not deserve the end they had. My writing was great and I received several compliments from the teacher, for that reason, I felt entitled to send you the file with the documentary and to know your opinion about it. Wait for your comments anxiously.
All the best.
D.M
The <span>conclusion you can draw about the little girl in "The Little Girl in the Blue Armchair" by Mary Cassatt is that </span><span>She is a delicate young lady. </span>
Answer:
In his essay "The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain," poet Langston Hughes interprets the statement of a young African-American poet that, "I want to be a poet—not a Negro poet," to mean, "I want to write like a white poet"; this suggests he was really expressing a subconscious desire to be white. Hughes goes on to argue that this apparent aspiration to bourgeois gentility, as embodied by the dominant Caucasian society, and the psychological cost that adherence to its constraints on creative freedom implies, is terribly damaging to the quality of the creative work and to the spiritual integrity of any African American artist who would embrace it. And it only adds insult to injury that not only does white society pressure African American artists to conform to its standards, but his own people often share the same attitude: "Oh, be respectable, write about nice people, show how good we are, . . . "
Explanation:
Answer:
- Ben has not committed an assault or a battery because he acted in self defense.
Explanation:
As per the question, the statement that illustrates a true claim regarding the given situation is that Ben has neither committed an assault or battery as whatever he did(shoving Mike) was just an action in self-defense to protect himself from Mike's blow. It was Mike who attempts to strike Ben at first while the latter was just attempting to safeguard himself from his blow. Therefore, Ben's actions could not be considered either an offense/assault or battery as he acted in Self-defense and not intentionally.
