1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
seraphim [82]
3 years ago
5

Explain what gave other Europeans the courage to begin fighting against their own oppressive leaders.

History
1 answer:
yan [13]3 years ago
5 0
This chapter, which analyses the theories of cultural action which develop from antidialogical and dialogical matrices, will make frequent reference to points presented in the previous chapters, either to expand these points or to clarify new affirmations.

I shall start by reaffirming that humankind, as beings of the praxis, differ from animals, which are beings of pure activity. Animals do not consider the world; they are immersed in it. In contrast, human beings emerge from the world, objectify it, and in so doing can understand it and transform it with their labor.

Animals, which do not labor, live in a setting which they cannot transcend. Hence, each animal species lives in the context appropriate to it, and these contexts, while open to humans, cannot communicate among themselves.

But human activity consists of action and reflection: it is praxis; it is transformation of the world. And as praxis, it requires theory to illuminate it. Human activity is theory and practice; it is reflection and action. It cannot, as I stressed in chapter 2, be reduced to either verbalism or activism.

Lenin's famous statement: "Without a revolutionary theory there can be no revolutionary movement"1 means that a revolution is achieved with neither verbalism nor adtivism, but rather with praxis, that is, with reflection and action directed at the structures to be transformed. The revolutionary effort to transform these structures radically cannot designate its leaders as its thinkers and the oppressed as mere doers.

If true commitment to the people, involving the transformation of the reality by which they are oppressed, requires a theory of transforming action, this theory cannot fail to assign the people a fundamental role in the transformation process. The leaders cannot treat the oppressed as mere activists to be denied the opportunity of reflection and allowed merely the illusion of acting, whereas in fact they would continue to be manipulated—and in this case by the presumed foes of manipulation.

The leaders do bear the responsibility for coordination and, at times, direction—but leaders who deny praxis to the oppressed thereby invalidate their own praxis. By imposing their word on others, they falsify that word and establish a contradiction between their methods and their objectives. If they are truly committed to liberation, their action and reflection cannot proceed without the action and reflection of others.

Revolutionary praxis must stand opposed to the praxis of the dominant elites, for they are by nature antithetical. Revolutionary praxis cannot tolerate an absurd dichotomy in which the praxis of the people is merely that of following the leaders decisions—a dichotomy reflecting the prescriptive methods of the dominant elites. Revolutionary praxis is a unity, and the leaders cannot treat the oppressed as their possession.

Manipulation, sloganizing, "depositing," regimentation, and prescription cannot be components of revolutionary praxis, precisely because they are components of the praxis of domination. In order to dominate, the dominator has no choice but to deny true praxis to the people, deny them the right to say their own word and think their own thoughts. He and she cannot act dialogically; for to do so would mean either that they had relinquished their power to dominate and joined the cause of the oppressed, or had lost that power through miscalculation.
You might be interested in
Woodrow Wilson established which government institution to secure the US banking system?
IgorLugansk [536]
Federal Resere Board
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Life for migrants in the world today...
rewona [7]

Answer:

Today, more people than ever live in a country other than the one in which they were born. According to the IOM World Migration Report 2020, as of June 2019 the number of international migrants was estimated to be almost 272 million globally, 51 million more than in 2010. Nearly two thirds were labour migrants.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Jefferson belonged to the Democrat-Republicans who supported
pentagon [3]

Answer:

A B or D

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is true? It is illegal for interest groups to take part in a political campaign. Interest grou
MakcuM [25]
"<span>Political action committees are fighting to ban special interest groups" would be the best option, since many believe that these interest groups are creating an unfair advantage for the wealthy.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
An example of a dictator is ______
lidiya [134]
B. Other two don't make sense.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did congress wish to treat the southern states
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Muhammad and his followers flee from Mecca?
    6·2 answers
  • How big is a ziggurat?
    12·1 answer
  • Why is the torah important to Judaism?
    6·1 answer
  • Which group was not a target for racism in the United States during world war two
    7·1 answer
  • One way investors and buyers made a great deal of money was by buying stocks "on themargin". What does this mean? a.Buyers pool
    11·1 answer
  • 5 successes of john F kennedy
    8·1 answer
  • Why did man volunteer to fight in the civil war?
    13·1 answer
  • Name at least two things that contributed to the rise of totalitarianism in Europe during the 1920s and 1930s. (Hint: Consider w
    14·1 answer
  • Why does math have to get so complicated
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!