1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DanielleElmas [232]
3 years ago
7

King Menes _____ upper and lower Egypt, founded the capital city of Memphis, and established the first Egyptian____ . Egyptian p

haraohs, like Menes, were also believed to be gods; this form of government, in which political leaders are also religious figures, is called a_____ . what do you fill it in with
History
2 answers:
deff fn [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1. United

2.Dynasty

3. Theocracy

Explanation:

Just had the same question

pashok25 [27]3 years ago
3 0

Hello!

I think it goues like this

King Menes pharaoh  upper and lower Egypt, founded the capital city of Memphis, and established the first Egyptian dynasty. Egyptian pharaohs, like Menes, were also believed to be gods; this form of government, in which political leaders are also religious figures, is called a nomarch.

<u>I hope is all ggood!!! :)</u>

You might be interested in
Ancient Babylonian canals are most similar in function to which modern invention
Rasek [7]
The ancient Babylonian canals and waterways are the most similar in function to the Suez canal. It is a man-made canal that runs between Africa and the Sinai Penselua. It is primarily used by large shipping companies as a shortcut down the East Coast of Africa from Europe. Ships used to have to go all the way down the West Coast of Africa, around the Horn of Africa to get to Eastern Africa. Manmade canals and waterways are also used in low-lying countries such as the Netherlands to drain the water from the land into the sea. 
3 0
3 years ago
How did the make-up of the Roman Senate change over time?
vladimir1956 [14]

First it's important to think about the complications involved with the word “empire.” Rome was an empire (country ruling over other countries) before the first emperor, but the word derives from imperator, the name used by Augustus. But it meant “wielder of military power,” a kind of uber-general and was specifically not supposed to connote the idea of an emperor as we think of it today (the goal was to avoid being called a king or being seen as one). Earlier, Augustus was known as <span>dux </span>(leader) and also, later <span>princeps </span>(first citizen). As far as I know, in the days of the republic, Rome called the provinces just provinciaeor socii or amici, without a general term for their empire unless it was imperium romanum, but that really meant the military power of Rome (over others) without being a reference to the empire as a political entity. It didn’t become an empire because of the emperors, and the way we use these words now can cloud the already complicated political situation in Rome in the 1st century BC.

The point is this: the Roman Republic did have an empire as we conceive it, but the Senate was unwilling to make changes that would have enabled it to retain power over the empire. By leaving it to proconsuls to rule provinces, they allowed proconsuls, who were often generals of their armies whether they were actually proconsul at any given time or not, to accrue massive military power (imperium) that could be exerted over Rome itself. (This, by the way, is in part the inspiration behind moving American soldiers around so much—it takes away the long-term loyalty a soldier may have toward a particular general.)

So the Senate found itself in no position to defy Caesar, who named himself the constitutional title of dictator for increasing periods until he was dictator for life, or Octavian (later named Augustus), who eventually named himself imperator.

The Senate had plenty of warning about this. The civil wars between Sulla and Marius gave plenty of reason for it to make real changes, but they were so wedded to the mos maiorum (tradition of the ancestors) that they were not willing to address the very real dangers to the republic that their constitution, which was designed for a city-state, was facing (not that I have too many bright ideas about what they could have done).

To finally come around to the point, the Senate went from being the leading body of Rome to being a rubber stamp on whatever the imperator wished, but there was no single moment when Rome became an empire and the Senate lost power, and these transformations don't coincide.

For one thing, the second triumvirate was legally sanctioned (unlike the informal first triumvirate), so it was a temporary measure—it lasted two 5-year terms— and the time Octavian spent as dux was ambiguous as to where he actually stood or would stand over the long term (in 33 BC, the second term of the second triumvirate expired, and he was not made imperator until 27). When he named himself imperator, he solidified that relationship and took on the posts of consul and tribune (and various combinations of posts as time went on).

If we simplify, we would say that the Senate was the leading body of Rome before the first emperor and a prestigious but powerless body afterwards, though senators were influential in their own milieus.

One other thing to keep in mind is that Octavian’s rise to Caesar Imperator Augustus Was by no means peaceful and amicable. He gets a reputation in many people’s minds as dictatorial but stable and peaceful, but the proscriptions of the second triumvirate were every bit as bloody and greedy as those of Sulla. Ironically, it was Julius Caesar who was forgiving to his former enemies after he named himself dictator. Augustus did end widespread killings and confiscations after becoming imperator, but that was only after striking fear into everyone and wiping out all his enemies, including the likes of Cicero<span>.</span>

6 0
3 years ago
Choose the word or phrase that best completes each of the following sentences.
kotegsom [21]

Answer:

A. Intimidation

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
PLZ HELP ASAP
Pie

Answer:

D enslaved people are well treated

5 0
3 years ago
What is the definition of limeted goverment
Nadya [2.5K]

Limited government is defined as a governing or controlling body whose power exists only within pre-defined limits that are established by a constitution or other source of authority.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • AP US History question:
    13·1 answer
  • i need help with the short answer and essay question can someone just explain them to me but if you can maybe start it off or wr
    13·1 answer
  • What statement best describes the relationship between the programs of the new deal and the end of the Great Depression
    15·2 answers
  • What made the Great Depression unprecedented? Were the measures taken to end the longest economic downturn in American history c
    13·1 answer
  • Proposed by Congress after the Election of 1800, what did the Twelfth Amendment accomplish? * 1 point
    7·1 answer
  • Early in the Industrial Revolution, why did many employers want to hire women and children rather than men to work in factories?
    15·1 answer
  • Please help me and please us the picture for answer
    12·1 answer
  • It’s not d (I’ll mark u as brainlist)
    12·2 answers
  • Though the capital would move again in 1807, the movement of the capital of Georgia from Augusta to Louisville was representativ
    8·2 answers
  • Kadesh was a battle fought during a war between the Egyptians, led by Ramses, and the Hittites, in modern southern Syria. It was
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!