Answer:
If we examine a sample of tires used for 60,000 miles and determine the proportion that are worn out, how likely is that proportion to be 3.6% or less?
Step-by-step explanation:
First of all, when you want to contrast two hypothesis you need a confidence level p% without which the comparison makes no sense.
In this case, you want to refuse the null hypothesis (the average is 5%) with an alternative one (the average is less than 5%).
You propose a new average (3.6%) based on the evidence.
You cannot prove that the average is actually 3.6%, <em>but if you somehow determine that the probability the average is greater than 3.6% is lower than 100% minus your confidence level p% ,then you can refute the null hypothesis and accept the alternative one as new average.
</em>
So, from the possible choices, the one that fits the best is
If we examine a sample of tires used for 60,000 miles and determine the proportion that are worn out, how likely is that proportion to be 3.6% or less?
Answer:
i think x = -4, y = 5
Step-by-step explanation:
x = 16 - 4y
3x + 4y = 8
3(16 - 4y)+4y = 8
48-12y+4y = 8
48-8y = 8
48-8 = 8y
40 = 8y
5 = y
so
x = 16 - 4y
x = 16 - 4(5)
x = 16 - 20
x = -4
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
so what you would do in order to solve this equation is do inverse operations. what you do to one side of teh equal sign you have to do to the other. so you divide 3/7n by 3/7 which would isolate n. then you would do teh same thing to the 27. 27/ 3/7= 63
n=63
The answer is G because you have to go 5 units to the left and 4 units up from 0 in the second quadrant
