I believe you can just click the three dots that appear to the top right on their response and report , I don’t know any other way unfortunately.
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.
Answer:
No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.
The correct answer is b, good luck
Answer:
The separated and balanced the powers among the different branches. Gave each branch a way to check the use of power by the other branches to protect the rights and welfare of people. Each branch is given an equal amount of power to balance the responsibilities. Checking powers gives each branch a way to stop the other branch from making final decisions or from taking certain actions.
Explanation:
Answer: mala prohibita
Explanation:
Malum in se is simply a Latin phrase that means that something wrong or evil. Examples include murder, assault, robbery etc. These act are wrongful.
Malum prohibitum, simply m and that something that's considered to be wrong because it's prohibited. Examples include indecent exposure, not using helmets by bikers etc.
