1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gre4nikov [31]
3 years ago
9

What factors help explain why the police solve so "few" crimes?

Law
1 answer:
Mrac [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: d. All of the above

Explanation:

Some crimes are quite complicated in structure to solve as they leave little evidence to enable the police to capitalize on and solve.

Police response is also reactive which means that they cannot prevent crime per say, they can only try to solve it. This puts them at a disadvantage because they are essentially a step behind the criminals which means they have to do more to catch up than the criminal has to do to escape.

Police powers are also quite limited especially in a democratic nation like the United States because they have to abide by certain rules. For instance, if a search and seizure is illegal, regardless of if incriminating evidence is found, the criminal has a good chance of being freed. These rules make solving crimes difficult sometimes because some crimes cannot be solved conventionally.

You might be interested in
A/an ____ is the transfer to a higher court of a case decided in a lower court to review it for errors of law
o-na [289]

Answer:

Appeals?

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
In criminal trial, a finding of guilt is one kind of
yarga [219]
Answer : A?



explanation: i think so .
4 0
3 years ago
8. Why do all drug cases have to have the drugs analyzed before court?
dusya [7]

Answer: They do it because it might look like cocaine or LSD but that doesn't mean it actually is

Explanation:The prosecution must prove that a seized substance is indeed the illicit drug it claims it is by sending the evidence to a crime lab for analysis. The crime lab analyst then must testify at trial in order for the prosecution to make its case.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a law that draws a line between moral and legal obligation
Svetlanka [38]

Answer:moral obligation consist in facts about the intentional states of agents, while legal obligation is grounded on coercive institutional facts, which are external to the agents' intentionality.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Im 13 should i have a phone
grin007 [14]
Um well it is 2020 im not surprised but uh sure?
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is Bentham's greatest happiness principle?
    14·1 answer
  • The use of the public wearing of letters was used to publicly shame criminals, including those who
    8·2 answers
  • Real question. im a legally able to label as a woman if i have a beard?
    7·2 answers
  • ANY COLLEGE STUDENT KNOW HOW EXAMITY WORKS?
    7·1 answer
  • On January 1, 2009, a comedian from State A filed a diversity action in State A federal court against an actor from State B. The
    15·1 answer
  • Note that most projection pages include other important races being voted on today. Why do those races matter? What are the larg
    7·2 answers
  • Any One Wanna Be Friend's.
    7·1 answer
  • How is the vice president of the United States selected?
    8·2 answers
  • List 6 assaultive-type crimes, the elements required to prove the crime, and an example of each​
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements describes a general perspective of Latino parents?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!