2. What is the bottle tax supposed to be funding? The bottle tax is supposed to be funding

1 answer:

Volgvan3 years ago

7 0

The fee is used to fund that portion of system operations costs (collection, transportation and marketing) not covered by material revenues (i.e., the 'salvage value' of the containers) and unredeemed deposits. Beverage container deposit laws, or bottle bills, are designed to reduce litter and capture bottles, cans, and other containers for recycling. Ten states and Guam have a deposit-refund system for beverage containers. They paid that deposit to the manufacturer when the container was bought and they're only passing it along to you. The store keeps none of the deposit, or the recycling fee. ... They pay the deposit and recycling fee to Encorp once the container is shipped.

You might be interested in

due to the distance between britain and north america british soldiers in north amrica often lacked what?

I am Lyosha [343]

I think the answer is communication!

3 0

3 years ago

I need the answer for 21 plz

velikii [3]

False hope this helps. mark as brainliest please

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Someone please just help -

Sonbull [250]

Answer:

I think it is A im not sure and im sorry if im wrong but i belive its A

8 0

3 years ago

How does federalism relate to the Civil War?

maks197457 [2]

Federalism is the separation of state and national government's powers. One of the reasons that the Civil War occurred was over the debate of state vs. national powers.

7 0

3 years ago

The gulf of tonkin resolution: question 27 options: was a nonbinding measure that passed both the house and senate calling for p

AveGali [126]

The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution <span> authorized the president to take "all necessary measures to repel armed attack" in Vietnam.

This resolution had significant consequences for the Vietnam War and beyond that time. In regard to the Vietnam War, it provided the justification for the president, Lyndon Johnson, to escalate US involvement in the war and magnify the number of US troops there by hundreds of thousands. In US foreign policy in general, it represented an increase of the power of the Commander in Chief (the president) to deploy troops without getting formal approval in advance from Congress.
</span>

3 0

3 years ago