It would be the "Executive Branch" of government that has the power to pardon people found guilty of federal crimes, since this power lies solely with the President of the United States.
The right to be left alone is protected by the Supreme Court decisions in Griswold v Connecticut and Roe v Wade.
the right to be left alone
<u>Explanation:</u>
The judgment of the Supreme Court in Griswold v Connecticut case slackened the law that prohibited birth control. Birth control was considered illegal under the law in the state of Connecticut from the 1800s. The issue didn’t make it to the court till 1965.
The court decided that the prohibition of birth control wouldn’t remain valid anymore its 1965 judgment. The verdict ensured a person’s right to privacy by finding out that the birth control prohibition law violated a person’s right to marital privacy.
In the Roe v Wade case of 1973 the court ruled that a pregnant woman had the liberty to choose to have an abortion and there wouldn’t be excessive government restriction on that liberty. The decisions of the Supreme Court safeguarded the right to privacy of the people.
Answer:
1. The answer is P. B. S. Pinchback. Pinchback was an American publisher and politician, a Union Army officer, and the first African American to become governor of a U.S. He was also the only one in all of his time of service.
2. The answer is Maynard Jackson. He was a member of the Democratic party and he was also a lawyer and businessperson. He was first elected for the job of mayor in as recently as 1973.
3. The answer is also Maynard Jackson. The mayor built in an entire new terminal at Hartsfield Airport. In fact, the airport was renamed Hartsfield-Jackson as a tribute to him after his death in 2003.
4. Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. brought professional sports teams to Atlanta.
5. Mayor Andrew Young helped bring the 1976 Summer Olympic Games to Atlanta, Georgia.
I hope this helps! Have a great rest of your day! :D
Answer:
Thank yo for asking this...I was waiting for someone to ask me this.
EXPLANATION: This article examines the extent to which state officials are subject to prosecution in foreign domestic courts for international crimes. We consider the different types of immunity that international law accords to state officials, the reasons for the conferment of this immunity and whether they apply in cases in which it is alleged that the official has committed an international crime. We argue that personal immunity (immunity ratione personae) continues to apply even where prosecution is sought for international crimes
The major concern of scientists who left Nazi Germany for the states before ww2 was that a new Nazi would heavily persecute the Jews ,many of whom held positions in the realm of science
