1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lina2011 [118]
3 years ago
11

Why did many Americans blame Britain for their Problems?

History
2 answers:
Ymorist [56]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

They believed that British actions were harming their economy and threatening expansion into western lands. (impressment, forts on US land supporting Native Americans)

Explanation:

Fofino [41]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The British impressed US sailors, and supported Native American attacks on American settlers. The war ended in a draw but it proved the new country could survive a war with another country.:

You might be interested in
Which of the following examples shows the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic?
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

All of the choices are correct. The fact that Censors appointed, and could remove, senators;  Tribunes could veto laws; and Consuls were elected for one-year terms are examples of the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic.

Explanation:

The Roman Republic was a political regime with a highly original approach. A regime that, despite all its political intrigues, reached almost 500 years. Probably, one of the reasons why it lasted so long is because it was a carefully balanced system. In this regard, the Greek historian Polybius said that Rome had a mixed government, fruit of a process that he called anacyclosis. It is known as such, to the succession of a series of political systems due to its irremediable tendency towards degeneration. Consequently, Rome knew a monarchy that degenerated into tyranny, also an aristocracy that ended up being oligarchic, until finally it reached a system closer to democracy.

In this way, the Roman Republic could contain features of these three political systems, thus giving it, according to Polybius, a certain superiority. Why? Because the main elements of the republic, which embody each of the three systems, must cooperate so that it works. For example, for a war, the consul - monarchy - will need, both a resolution of the senate -aristocracy- for the sending of legions, and the approval of the people (in elections) -democracy-, since it is whoever annuls or ratifies the armistices and treaties. In addition, the Senate will also depend on the people, because it is the people who, after the deliberation of the Senate, must approve those procedures in which there are crimes against the State that are punished with the death penalty. Likewise, the people will need the Senate insofar as this chamber is fundamental to carry out the public works that are first executed through the management of the town.  

What does the description described so far mean? Simply, that we are before a forerunner of the system of checks and balances. The current one, coming from Locke and Montesquieu, proposes a division between executive, legislative and judicial. But its old equivalent did not distinguish between powers, but forced an interorganic cooperation. In this way, in order to carry out certain competences, it might be necessary for two or more bodies to collaborate, thus preventing any of them from acting in a despotic manner. Meanwhile, there is currently a division of competence according to which each body has established guidelines, and the key to avoid despotism is precisely the opposite: that none of them interfere in the competencies of others.

5 0
3 years ago
1.Who might want his electronic devices to come preprogrammed?
Bad White [126]

Answer:

e=mc2

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why did many people move from Britain to the British colonies in America? ​
babunello [35]

Answer:

One reason is that they moved to practice their own religion.

Explanation:

I know its not alot but hope it helps :)

3 0
3 years ago
1. How did Washington feel about "sectionalism"?
chubhunter [2.5K]
2. D
he really was personal and to himself and didn’t believe in that
8 0
3 years ago
Which statement is true?
bazaltina [42]

Answer:

I think maybe C

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was it easy to get jobs in the 1800s
    13·2 answers
  • Mc)how did the u.s. government respond to entrance into world war ii?
    7·1 answer
  • The american general who would emerge as a national hero in the wake of the battle of new orleans was
    14·2 answers
  • Can someone please help me with my U.S History work?!
    5·1 answer
  • 14. Name all of the New England, Colonies.
    10·1 answer
  • The years between the First and Second World wars saw [Q1] aviators setting records. The record-setting aviators became internat
    7·1 answer
  • History: Complete the chart below by identifying three similarities between the classroom activity and the Catholic Church’s sel
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these was a goal of the First Crusade ? to halt the spread of Muslim rule to convince the to rule Jerusalem jointly to
    13·2 answers
  • The main difference between enumerated powers and implied powers in the Constitution is that
    12·1 answer
  • What president was elected with an overwhelming majority of electoral votes in 1980?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!