Answer:
Create realistic goals everyday, short and long term (i.e. waking up earlier by easing yourself into it, 30 minutes earlier one week, 1 hour earlier the next, etc.)
Find small ways to incorporate time and energy into said goal (want to be a better artist? draw your notes into pictures or think about how your day went and draw the most interesting that happened.)
Ask what makes you motivated to complete goals and utilize half of your energy into goal (don't use all of your energy unless you have the time or ability because you don't want to burn out too quickly.)
Explanation:
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
Answer:
I think they whould all agree that lying is wrong.
Explanation:
I think they would think this because what they do is tell the truth about the world and differnt things. Not lie about them.