ANSWER:
As India celebrates 70 years of independence from the British, there is an alternative lens to view the history of the two nations. A history not solely defined by the Raj, but one that evolved during a period in the mid-eighteenth century before British rule became entrenched. I’d go so far to argue that to fully understand 1947, you have to understand how the British entered India in the 1770s.
Explanation:
Back then, when the future wasn't yet written, there was still a possibility of exchange between cultures. This exchange would not be available when racial stratification and ‘us’ versus ‘them’ polarities became the norm. It was a time of acceptance and rejection, when class, rather than skin colour was often the over-riding factor of difference.
Answer:
<em>With these provisions the Treaty of Versailles threatened Germany with defeat. </em>
Many defeated the German army whereas others deprived the vanquished country of territory, economy and population wealth and pressured it to take responsibility for both the war and end up having to pay compensation.
The key terms of the Treaty of Versailles were:
- Capitulation of all German colonies as mandates of the League of Nations.
- The shift to France of Alsace-Lorraine;
- Surrender of Eupen-Malmedy to Belgium, Memel to Lithuania, Hultschin to Czechoslovakia.
The correct answer is FALSE. Federalism is sharing the power between federal and state governments, not because of a strong government. So, it is false.
Accurate maps and sea charts helped them
Answer:
beringia
Explanation:
because ots the only one that would make sense
