I think it would be 2 because it looks like 6 is the total and 3 is a side number so if you were to multiply 3 times 2 it would be 6. I hope this is correct!
Answer:
65°
Step-by-step explanation:
JM = JK (all sides of a rhombus are equal)
Angle JKM = 25° (isosceles triangle)
Angle JKL = 50° (consecutive angles of rhombus)
Angle MKL = 25° (angle subtraction)
Angle MLK = 130° (opposite angles of a rhombus)
Angle KLN = 50° (angles on a straight line)
Angle LKN = 40° (angle sum of triangle)
Angle MKN = 65° (angle addition)
So lets try to prove it,
So let's consider the function f(x) = x^2.
Since f(x) is a polynomial, then it is continuous on the interval (- infinity, + infinity).
Using the Intermediate Value Theorem,
it would be enough to show that at some point a f(x) is less than 2 and at some point b f(x) is greater than 2. For example, let a = 0 and b = 3.
Therefore, f(0) = 0, which is less than 2, and f(3) = 9, which is greater than 2. Applying IVT to f(x) = x^2 on the interval [0,3}.
Learn more about Intermediate Value Theorem on:
brainly.com/question/11377865
#SPJ4
Answer:
Option A) Discrete and quantitative
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following situation in the question:
In a study of the effect of handedness on athletic ability.
Variable 1: Handedness - right-handed, left-handed, and ambidextrous
Variable 2: Athletic ability measured on a 12-point scale.
Dependent Variable:
- The dependent variable is the response variable and its value depends on the independent variable.
- A change in independent variable leads to a change in the dependent variable.
For the given case the athlete ability is the dependent variable that depends on the independent variable of handedness.
Athletic ability is measured on a 12 point scale. thus, it can take numerical values from 0 to 12.
Thus, it is a quantitative variable.
Since theses values are always expressed in whole numbers and not in decimals so they cannot take all the values within an interval.
Thus, it is a discrete variable.
Option A) Discrete and quantitative
Answer:
Sea level
Step-by-step explanation:
In geography, 'Elevation' is measured in relation to sea level, so sea level would be zero.
Thus, Chicago is 600 feet above sea level and Seely, California is 200 feet below sea level.
If there were nothing but flat land all the way from Seely to the ocean, sea water would come in and cover Seely. Fortunately for the people in Seely. California's coastal mountain range is between the town and the ocean, so that does not happen.
