Answer:
Explanation:
At some colleges and universities, economics professors receive higher salaries than professors in some other fields.
A. Why might this be true?
Economists have a higher opportunity cost working in academia than professors in other fields because in certain fields that are different from academic,there is a lack of labor opportunity for professor and even when such arise ,they are difficult to get and another reason may be that economists who are good in some fields may employ themselves in other firms with higher wages because of their real life first hand experience, even when some colleges and universities wants to hire them, got to spend a greater amount of money than for professors in some other fields.
B. Some other colleges and universities have a policy of paying equal salaries to professors in all fields. At some of these schools, economics professors have lighter teaching loads than professors in some other fields. What role do the differences in teaching loads play
In order for university to employ working force which is hard to find, they put in place differences in teaching loads ,such differences in teaching load are intended to attract economics professors by providing nonmetary compensation
Answer:
The answer is 629,000.
Explanation:
- For each unit of M sold, the price is 7 and the cost is 3, so the contribution margin is 4;
- For each unit of N sold, the price is 4 and the cost is 2, so the contribution margin is 2;
- For each unit of O sold, the price is 6 and the cost is 3, so the contribution margin is 3;
- With the mix, 1 unit of sale contributes (contribution per mix) 3*M+1*N+2*O = 3*4+1*2+2*3 = 20
For covering the 340,000 of fixed costs, you have to sale 340,000/20 units. That's equal to 17,000 units.
Each unit of sales is equal to (price per mix) 7*M+4*N+6*O = 7*3+4*1+6*2 = 37. So, with 17,000 units, the total sales will be 17,000 * 37 = 629,000.
Answer:
The marginal benefit from selling the vane without restoring it is $200.
Explanation:
Marginal benefits are the extra income a company can get from selling one additional unit of production.
Zane had already spent $250 in purchasing the vane and the restoration process.
Zane has two options:
- Sell the vane as it is for $200.
- Keep restoring the vane, spend $200 more and sell the vane for $500.
If Zane decides to sell the vane as it is, his marginal benefit will be $200. That would not be enough to cover his costs, this transaction will result in a $50 loss.
If Zane decides to continue the restoration, then his marginal costs will be $200 extra, but his marginal benefit would be $500. If he chose this option he could end up earning a $50 profit.
<span>I would give excellent customer service to every customer that walks in so they will spread the word that this store has great service, this will bring in more customers that need parts. I would also recommend to the manager to market the store by offering free gifts if they spend 50 dollars or more, or give out some sort of incentives, maybe a punch card, if you get 10 punches, you can have 50% off your next order.</span>
Question:
For an economy starting at potential output, a decrease in autonomous expenditure in the short-run results in a(n):
A. increase in potential output
B. recessionary output gap
C. decrease in potential output
D. expansionary output gap
Answer:
The correct answer is B
Explanation:
A decrease in autonomous expenditure shifts the Planned Aggregate Expenditure curve downward thus creating a lower equilibrium output.
PAE = C + Ip + G + NX
where
PAE = Planned Aggregate Expenditure
C = consumption
Ip = Investment Spending
G = Government Spending
NX = Net Export
If an economy has its output equal to its potential, this will create a reduction in short-run equilibrium output leading to a recessionary output gap.
Cheers!
