An embargo is an official ban on a commercial activity or trade. One major con of an embargo on a country is that it might be harmful to an economy. Next would be the limited choice for consumers when an embargo is implemented. T<span>he imposing country could be deprived of markets and investment opportunities to competing countries. An embargo does not usually have a positive result. </span>
Answer:
c. promote social and environmental justice
Explanation:
- The environmentalist believes that the governments should set up a program that set forth and promotes the social and the environmental laws and the Justice
- To the environment and also creates set of standards that help protect and safeguard the interest of the planet and the atmosphere and thus thereby are enforced to protect the environment of the country.
Germany, Austria, Hungary, Turkey
2. Mazloum Abdi
In President George W. Bush's State of the Union Address of January 29, 2002, he reviewed the nation's response to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. President Bush drew controversy when he then sketched his plan for dealing with terrorism in the months and years that lay ahead. According to the president, the greatest threat to America came not simply from Al Qaeda, but from an Axis of Evil—nations that represented the ultimate repression of human freedom. The three rogue states—Iraq, Iran and North Korea—not only oppressed their own people, but also actively aided terrorist groups. Defeating this Axis of Evil became the cornerstone of the Bush administration's plan to defeat global terrorism.
Explanation:
Answer:
It carries out the development work properly by utilizing the available means and resources in an effective way to fulfill the needs of the country. It helps for sustainable use of means and resources while carrying out the development and constructive works.
Explanation:
Hope this answer helps you :)
Have a great day
Mark brainliest
Answer:
The correct answer is option B "National Labor Relations"
Explanation:
More than 33% of private area businesses (various guidelines apply in the open division) as of late reviewed confessed to having explicit standards forbidding workers from examining their compensation with coworkers.2' interestingly, just around 1 out of 14 bosses have effectively embraced a "pay transparency" policy. Around fifty-one percent of the businesses studied expressed that they didn't have a particular arrangement in regards to pay mystery or 21 confidentiality issues. Survey information additionally propose that chiefs are commonly inclined to24 PSC rules. A predictable finding in inquire about going back to the 1970s is that a huge extent of directors concur with the utilization of PSC (pay secrecy and confidentiality) rules. Available information along these lines seems to recommend that a noteworthy number of managers have either an inclination for, or have really established explicit PSC rules. To put it plainly, it's anything but an exaggeration to propose that businesses seem to lean toward pay mystery and secrecy.
What makes the predominance of these standards so intriguing is the way that they have been reliably seen as unlawful under the National Labor Relations Acts.
