Answer: GNP; GDP
Explanation:
<em>The value of what a Canadian-owned Tim Hortons produces in South Korea is included in the Canadian </em><em><u>GNP </u></em><em>and the South Korean </em><em><u>GDP</u></em><em>. </em>
Gross National Product refers to the total amount of domestic production and foreign production that can be attributed to the residents of a nation.
This means that GNP includes the GDP and income earned by residents of the country in other countries but less the income earned by foreigners in the country. For Canada therefore, the value of goods produced by the Canadian company in South Korea will be added to the GNP.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on the other hand is simply the total final value of goods and services produced in a country regardless of if it was foreigners or residents doing the production. The value of what a Canadian-owned Tim Hortons produces in South Korea is therefore included in South Korea's GDP.
Answer:
<em>An </em><em><u>accounting</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>profit</u></em><em> is calculated by subtracting the firm's costs from its total revenues, </em><em><u>excluding</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>opportunity</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>cost</u></em>
Economic sustainability can be viewed through five capital include:
A. The natural capital comes from our ecological system.
B. The produced capital comes from our productive activities.
C. The human capital comes from our talented people.
D. Social capital comes from social trust and social interaction.
E. The financial capital connects all the previous four capitals.
Explanation:
All of these economic goals can come at risk if factory polluted water did not get a satisfactory solution to that local area where it is operating. If people of the local area or water management authorities go to court or protest against factory violence against damaging natural resource, the factory can face all above economic issues which can disturb its economic goals
Answer:
The statute is unconstitutional because the right to ban all truthful advertising for a product is not automatically justified by the right to ban the sale of a product entirely.
Explanation:
Considering the scenario described in the question above, the would court likely to rule that "the statute is unconstitutional because the right to ban all truthful advertising for a product is not automatically justified by the right to ban the sale of a product entirely."
This is because according to the regulations guiding the Advertisement of products and services, the state can only limit a truthful and non-deceptive advertisement of products and services if the state asserts a substantial government interest. Otherwise, it would be considered to be an improper restriction of commercial speech in as much the advertisement is not misleading and fraudulent.