Answer:
terry v. ohio
Explanation:
Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."
Answer:
the answer is C the Commerce Clause
Explanation: Monson and Raich sued, claiming that enforcing Federal law against them would violate the Commerce Clause, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, the Ninth Amendment, the Tenth Amendment, and the doctrine of medical necessity.
Answer:
they believed the law would help to slow the rate of crime
Explanation:
The term that applies to Edward in this case regarding the situation with Vicky is B. claimant.
<h3>Who is a claimant?</h3>
It should be noted that a claimant simply means a person that's eligible to make a claim especially on a lawsuit.
In this case, Vicky is taking Edward to small claims court. Vicky claims that Edward owes her money for a project she completed; Edward says the work was substandard and he doesn’t have to pay
Learn more about claimant on:
brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
This is a biology question
