The roots of the Arab–Israeli conflict have been attributed to the support by Arab League member countries for the Palestinians, a fellow League member, in the ongoing Israeli–Palestinian conflict, which in turn has been attributed to the simultaneous rise of Zionism and Arab nationalism
I believe the answer is: A) an uncompromising belief that they were the superior race
By adopting the belief that they are superior, they feel that they have the right to kill and execute members of different cultures like animals. This also make them feel that they are the most suitable rulers for the world, which they use to justify their actions when they invade neighbouring countries.
Answer:
the blue prius because he is prob going straight and he shouldnt have to stop because there's no sign that says he has to stop
Explanation:
Answer:
The website/book/place where you found the information. The materials you use to do something.
Explanation:
Basically, the things you used to create something
Answer:
This question is incomplete. It is missing names and descriptions of the court cases descriptions that are needed to be matched. Here they are (correctly matched):
<em>Tape v. Hurley: </em><em>The California Supreme Court forced San Francisco to admit Chinese students into public schools.
</em>
- This case ended in <u>March 1885</u>, with the Supreme Court decision that refusal to admit a Chinese American student Mamie Tape to the all-white Spring Valley School was unlawful. This was a landmark court case.
<em>United States v. Wong Kim Ark: </em><em>The Supreme Court ruled the Fourteenth Amendment awarded citizenship to children of Chinese immigrants born on American soil.
</em>
- This case was decided on <u>March 28, 1898</u>, with the Supreme Court ruling that Wong Kim Ark, who was born in San Francisco in 1873 to Chinese couple, was unlawfully denied entry to the United States after his trip abroad.
<em>Yick Wo v. Hopkins:</em><em> The U.S. Supreme Court ordered the city of San Francisco to grant licenses to Chinese laundries.
</em>
- This case was decided on <u>May 10, 1886</u>, with the Supreme Court ruling that the administration of law in a discriminating manner is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In particular, here out of 200 applications, only one permit to operate a wooden building laundry was granted to a Chinese owner, while all non-Chinese owners always received permits.
